1979
DOI: 10.1093/icb/19.2.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behavior of Communicating: An Analysis of the 22 kHz Call of Rats (Rattus Norvegicus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previously mentioned research demonstrating a facilitation of darting activity in estrous females exposed to copulatory 50-kHz vocalizations (Mclntosh et al, 1978;Thomas et al, 1981). In addition, there was a significant decrease in solicitation behavior following ejaculation in each of the three conditions; that is, regardless of the presence (I-I condition) or the absence (D-D condition) of postejaculatory 22-kHz vocalizations (Adler & Anisko, 1979;Barfield & Geyer, 1972), the females exhibited fewer darts/minute following ejaculation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is consistent with previously mentioned research demonstrating a facilitation of darting activity in estrous females exposed to copulatory 50-kHz vocalizations (Mclntosh et al, 1978;Thomas et al, 1981). In addition, there was a significant decrease in solicitation behavior following ejaculation in each of the three conditions; that is, regardless of the presence (I-I condition) or the absence (D-D condition) of postejaculatory 22-kHz vocalizations (Adler & Anisko, 1979;Barfield & Geyer, 1972), the females exhibited fewer darts/minute following ejaculation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The shorter ERLs and ESLs found in the present experiment with females paired with control-operated males might reflect a general increase of proceptive behavior in the estrous female that has been exposed to 50-kHz copulatory vocalizations rather than the presence or absence of 22-kHz calls during the refractory period. Adler and Anisko (1979) reported no difference in the latency of a female to approach and/or solicit a male during the postejaculatory interval in which the male exhibited 22-kHz vocalizations or remained silent in an ad lib (non-tether) testing situation in a large seminatural environment. Since the males were not devocalized in the Adler and Anisko experiment, the females probably were exposed to 50-kHz copulatory vocalizations during the preejaculatory period regardless of whether the male exhibited the 22-kHz vocalizations during the refractory period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In rats, calls are similarly reported during male confrontation (Sales 1972). These vocalisations are produced mainly by the intruder animal Thomas et al 1983) and it was suggested that these calls were emitted to inhibit the aggressive behaviour of the resident male (Lehman and Adams 1977;Adler and Anisko 1979). In mice, prefighting "V" calls did not prevent aggression, as all pairs began to fight within the first minute of confrontation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%