2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.13298
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behavior of essential dimension under specialization II

Abstract: Let G be a linear algebraic group over a field. We show that, under mild assumptions, in a family of primitive generically free G-varieties over a base variety B the essential dimension of the geometric fibers may drop on a countable union of Zariski closed subsets of B and stays constant away from this countable union. We give several applications of this result.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.2 also implies a slightly weaker version of Theorem 1.1, in which the morphism X → Spec k is assumed to be smooth. Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 are related in spirit with the results in [16,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Theorem 1.2 also implies a slightly weaker version of Theorem 1.1, in which the morphism X → Spec k is assumed to be smooth. Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 are related in spirit with the results in [16,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The horizontal map is injective by [29,Lemma 3.3(b)]. 4 Note that the assumptions of Theorem 1.3, that G 0 is reductive and G/G 0 is finite over D (and hence, over R and over S), are used to ensure that [29, Lemma 3.3(b)] applies.…”
Section: The Resolvent Degree Of An Abelian Varietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29, Lemma 3.3(b)] is a variant of the Grothendieck-Serre Conjecture over a Henselian discrete valuation ring. A theorem of Nisnevich, establishing the Grothendick-Serre Conjecture in this context, is a key ingredient in our proof of both Proposition 13.1 and Theorem 1.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%