1980
DOI: 10.1149/1.2129716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behavior of Implanted Xenon When Used as a Marker during the Anodic Oxidation of Aluminum: Evidence for an Explanation of a Dose‐Dependant Splitting Effect

Abstract: Using 2 MeV lithium ions backscattering and transmission electron microscopy techniques, some of the xenon atoms introduced by implantation in aluminum metal under the initial oxide layer are shown to be transported by the moving metal-oxide interface during anodic oxidation. For specific anodization conditions (V at, T : 90~ this splitting of the initial xenon distribution is interpreted in terms of bubble formation and growth above a given local concentration threshold. A schematic model for this behavior ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is possible to explain the large value of TA~ 3+ obtained in the present study by the movement of phosphate inwards according to the electric field. However, it is notable that the transport number obtained by the marker method is dependent on the pre-existing films (14) and the acceleration voltage at the ion implantation of the marker (15). Dissolution characteristics of the oxide.--As can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, it is possible to explain the large value of TA~ 3+ obtained in the present study by the movement of phosphate inwards according to the electric field. However, it is notable that the transport number obtained by the marker method is dependent on the pre-existing films (14) and the acceleration voltage at the ion implantation of the marker (15). Dissolution characteristics of the oxide.--As can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The positioning of the marker in an anodic film is preferred to a location within the metal, since a marker located in the metal may remain at the metal/film interface. [21] Thus, in the present work, the argon incorporated into the alloy during sputtering is considered an unreliable marker for assessing ion migration. Nevertheless, the burial of the argon within the anodic film formed in ammonium pentaborate and sodium hydrogen phosphate electrolytes and the presence of argon near the surface of the anodic film formed in phosphoric acid electrolyte suggest that the films form by counter migration of metal and oxygen species.…”
Section: Film Growth In Sodium Hydrogen Phosphate and Ammonium Pentabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local oxidation has been attributed to the presence of tungsten-rich clusters in the enriched alloy layer [9], which move inwards relative to the original metal surface, carried by the retreating alloyfilm interface. Previous work has revealed similar transport of xenon, which has been suggested to be present as fine bubbles at the metal-film interface [19]. There is probably an adjustment of the enrichment of tungsten as the metal-film interface moves into regions of metal containing less tungsten.…”
Section: As Implantedmentioning
confidence: 78%