1972
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.5.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behavior of Suspended Solid Particles and Liquid in Bubble Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
119
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
119
2
Order By: Relevance
“…UgDT/Esl = l 3Fr/(l + 8Fr0-85) (8) The experimental values of Ep are lower than those of Esl and are larger than those of Ep given by Kojima and Asano.U) Kato et al8) correlated the longitudinal dispersion coefficient of solid particles in three-phase bubble columns as follows. In the range of Ret=0.3-2.5:…”
Section: Behavior Of Solid Particles In Lean Regionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…UgDT/Esl = l 3Fr/(l + 8Fr0-85) (8) The experimental values of Ep are lower than those of Esl and are larger than those of Ep given by Kojima and Asano.U) Kato et al8) correlated the longitudinal dispersion coefficient of solid particles in three-phase bubble columns as follows. In the range of Ret=0.3-2.5:…”
Section: Behavior Of Solid Particles In Lean Regionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Kato et al 6) and Nakamura et al 10) found that the gas holdup in bubble columns with suspended solid particles (G-L-S systems) was smaller than that in gas-liquid systems (G-L systems). Their results are in agreement with the present ones.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 31 Evaluation Of Variables Mean Gas mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid dispersion coefficients obtained in this study are compared with correlations from the literature (Kato et al, 1972;Baird and Rice, 1975;Deckwer et al, 1974). The correlations applicable to the column diameter and operating conditions used are listed in Table 4 There are several reasons for this.…”
Section: ) Gas Velocitymentioning
confidence: 89%