2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014ms000390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behavior of trade‐wind cloudiness in observations and models: The major cloud components and their variability

Abstract: Guided by ground-based radar and lidar profiling at the Barbados Cloud Observatory (BCO), this study evaluates trade-wind cloudiness in ECMWF's Integrated Forecast System (IFS) and nine CMIP5 models using their single-timestep output at selected grid points. The observed profile of cloudiness is relatively evenly distributed between two important height levels: the lifting condensation level (LCL) and the tops of the deepest cumuli near the trade-wind inversion (2-3 km). Cloudiness at the LCL dominates the tot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMIP framework provides a test of the atmospheric component of climate models given a realistic SST distribution. Monthly average output is used during the interval 1979-2005; using monthly mean output limits some interpretation of relationships between clouds and their environment because much of the variance is associated with faster timescales (12,24).…”
Section: Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AMIP framework provides a test of the atmospheric component of climate models given a realistic SST distribution. Monthly average output is used during the interval 1979-2005; using monthly mean output limits some interpretation of relationships between clouds and their environment because much of the variance is associated with faster timescales (12,24).…”
Section: Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 are the profiles of CF in the Barbados region during the summer and winter months, and, as seen above, the profiles show the clouds differ with season in the Barbados region as the regional circulation changes. In both seasons, there are frequent low-level clouds with maxima near the lifted condensation level (LCL) and higher up near the trade inversion (6,24). The dotted lines in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the contrary, in large-eddy simulations (LES) and in observations the cloud-base fraction of trade-wind cumuli appears to be much more resilient to changes in environmental conditions than in climate models, both in the current (Nuijens et al 2014(Nuijens et al , 2015a and projected warmer climate (Rieck et al 2012;Bretherton 2015). Interpreting these results remains difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloud amount predicted by LES, though often resilient to changes in thermodynamic conditions, is known to be sensitive to various aspects of the simulation such as resolution, microphysics, numerics or domain size (Vial et al 2017, and references therein). Theoretically, the apparent resilience of cloud-base cloud fraction has been interpreted as the consequence of a ''cumulus-valve mechanism'' whereby clouds act as a valve which helps maintain the top of the subcloud layer close to the lifting condensation level and thus regulate the area covered by cumulus updrafts at cloud base (Albrecht et al 1979;Neggers et al 2006;Stevens 2006;Nuijens et al 2015a). However, this idea has not been tested observationally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific limitations of modeled clouds include both features which differ from what one observes (e.g., ''too few, too bright,'' [Webb et al, 2001;Nam et al, 2012]) as well as features which are inadequately understood (e.g., controls on cloud vertical structure [Nuijens et al, 2015], and organization [Bretherton et al, 2005;Muller and Held, 2012;Wing and Emanuel, 2014]). An important component of these limitations is the delicacy of the interactions between clouds and circulations Sherwood et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%