2010
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.01.009.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behavioral relevance of multisensory neural response interactions

Abstract: Sensory information can interact to impact perception and behavior. Foods are appreciated according to their appearance, smell, taste and texture. Athletes and dancers combine visual, auditory, and somatosensory information to coordinate their movements. Under laboratory settings, detection and discrimination are likewise facilitated by multisensory signals. Research over the past several decades has shown that the requisite anatomy exists to support interactions between sensory systems in regions canonically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(137 reference statements)
5
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This further highlights the behavioral relevance of early-latency and low-level multisensory interactions in humans (Romei et al, 2007(Romei et al, , 2009Sperdin et al, 2009Sperdin et al, , 2010Noesselt et al, 2010;Van der Burg et al, 2011) as well as monkeys (Wang et al, 2008). Such a linear relationship also provides further support to the suggestion that looming signals are on the one hand preferentially processed neurophysiologically (Maier et al, 2008) and on the other hand subject to perceptual biases (Maier et al, 2004).…”
Section: Mechanisms Subserving the Integration Of Looming Signalssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). This further highlights the behavioral relevance of early-latency and low-level multisensory interactions in humans (Romei et al, 2007(Romei et al, , 2009Sperdin et al, 2009Sperdin et al, , 2010Noesselt et al, 2010;Van der Burg et al, 2011) as well as monkeys (Wang et al, 2008). Such a linear relationship also provides further support to the suggestion that looming signals are on the one hand preferentially processed neurophysiologically (Maier et al, 2008) and on the other hand subject to perceptual biases (Maier et al, 2004).…”
Section: Mechanisms Subserving the Integration Of Looming Signalssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similar correlations have recently been reported by Van der Burg et al (2011), where participants with greater earlylatency interactions showed bigger benefits of task-irrelevant sounds in the context of a visual feature detection task. Such findings thus add to a growing literature demonstrating the direct behavioral relevance of early-latency and low-level multisensory interactions (Sperdin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Relation Between Behavioral Facilitation and Gfp Enhancementsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Nonlinear ERP interactions appear to be the consequence of topographic modulations regardless of the specific type of stimuli and task. Still, it will be important to ascertain the specific mechanisms whereby task demands (Fort et al, 2002b), the sensory dominance of a given subject (Giard and Peronnet, 1999), and behavioral performance speed (Sperdin et al, 2009(Sperdin et al, , 2010) affect nonlinear neural response interactions. Subtle modulations in response profiles are consistent with what has recently been described as a "patchy" Figure 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analyses here are based on the application of an additive model to detect nonlinear neural response interactions, wherein the ERP in response to the AV S condition is contrasted with the summed ERPs in response to the A S and V S conditions (hereafter referred to as "pair" and "sum" ERPs, respectively). Such a model has been repeatedly applied in ERP and magnetoencephalography studies in humans (Miniussi et al, 1998;Giard and Peronnet, 1999;Foxe et al, 2000;Murray et al, 2001Murray et al, , 2005Molholm et al, 2002;Besle et al, 2004;Möttönen et al, 2004;Brefczynski-Lewis et al, 2009;Sperdin et al, 2009Sperdin et al, , 2010Raij et al, 2010) as well as electrophysiological investigations in nonhuman primates (Meredith and Stein, 1986;Stein and Meredith, 1993;Wallace et al, 1996;Wallace and Stein, 2007;Kayser et al, 2008). Despite its widespread application, this model nonetheless receives some criticism (Gondan and Röder, 2006), which has been refuted on theoretical and empirical grounds (Fort et al, 2002a;Besle et al, 2004).…”
Section: Eeg Acquisition and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies focusing on multisensory processing between auditory and visual stimuli (Fort et al, 2002;Molholm et al, 2002;Talsma et al, 2007), as well as on the crossmodal integration between other sensory modalities, like auditory and somatosensory stimuli (Foxe et al, 2000;Murray et al, 2005), confirmed the presence of early multisensory interactions around 50 ms. Invasive recordings in non-human primates showed similar early multisensory convergence (e.g., . Interestingly, recent studies have revealed the behavioral relevance of these early multisensory processes (Sperdin et al, 2009;Sperdin et al, 2010). However, some studies have failed to obtain short latency multisensory interactions (Gondan et al, 2005;Gondan and Roder, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%