Deficits following stroke are classically attributed to focal damage, but recent evidence suggests a key role of distributed brain network disruption. We measured resting functional connectivity (FC), lesion topography, and behavior in multiple domains (attention, visual memory, verbal memory, language, motor, and visual) in a cohort of 132 stroke patients, and used machine-learning models to predict neurological impairment in individual subjects. We found that visual memory and verbal memory were better predicted by FC, whereas visual and motor impairments were better predicted by lesion topography. Attention and language deficits were well predicted by both. Next, we identified a general pattern of physiological network dysfunction consisting of decrease of interhemispheric integration and intrahemispheric segregation, which strongly related to behavioral impairment in multiple domains. Network-specific patterns of dysfunction predicted specific behavioral deficits, and loss of interhemispheric communication across a set of regions was associated with impairment across multiple behavioral domains. These results link key organizational features of brain networks to brainbehavior relationships in stroke.stroke | functional connectivity | interhemispheric | memory | language A lthough structural damage from stroke is focal, remote dysfunction can occur in regions of the brain distant from the area of damage (1, 2). The set of regions that are directly damaged or indirectly affected is embedded within a larger functional network that is in dynamic balance with other networks in the brain. This framework posits that a lesion in a single location in the brain has the ability to disrupt brain functions far beyond the lesion boundaries (3-5).Numerous correlates of remote physiological dysfunction have been proposed, including abnormal task recruitment of contralesional brain areas (6-8), disruption of metabolism (9) or regional cerebral blood flow (10, 11), and more recently disruption of signal coherence (12-15).However, there is only a limited understanding of how remote physiological dysfunction is related to lesion topography (14, 16). Moreover, the behavioral relevance of reported physiological changes is unclear. Although some studies have reported significant correlation with behavioral impairment, the total amount of behavioral variance explained is unknown. Finally, because mechanisms of remote dysfunction have typically been examined in relatively small groups of individuals, their generalization at the population level is unknown. As a result, physiological measures of brain function are not used in the evaluation and treatment of stroke victims.More traditional lesion-symptom mapping studies have also used statistical methods to relate lesion topography to the severity of different behavioral deficits (17,18). An implicit assumption of these studies is that the strength of association between structural damage and behavior is the same irrespective of the behavior that is measured. However, it is also possi...