“…Whereas, the results from representative volume model delivered thermal conductivity values as 131 W/m⋅K, 126 W/m⋅K, 107 W/m⋅K and 76.9 W/m⋅K for Al‐ZC0, Al‐ZC1, Al‐ZC2, and Al‐ZC3 respectively. The deviation of simulated results from experimental results is ∼1.9 % for Al‐ZC0, ∼5.03 % for Al‐ZC1, ∼3.35 % for Al‐ZC2, and ∼1.75 % for Al‐ZC3.This discrepancy in simulated and experimental values is attributed to the phenomena like percolation present in the experimental specimens owing to inclusions touching each other, are extremely complicated to model while inclusion are in lower volume fraction [13, 14]. The lower coefficient of thermal expansion of ceramic particles than aluminium alloys may be the cause of this behaviour.…”