The cholecystokinin (CCK) neuropeptide has been identified in the brain (Vanderhaeghen 1975;Dockray 1976), the most abundant form corresponding to the C-terminal sulfated octapeptide fragment (CCK8). This neuropeptide interacts with the same affinity with two receptor types, designated CCK1 (previously named CCK-A) and CCK2 (previously named CCK-B) receptors, which both belong to the G-coupled receptor superfamily (Wank et al. 1992;Lee et al. 1993). However, the distribution of these two receptors is quite different since the CCK1-type is abundant in peripheral organs and in few discrete brain regions (Moran et al. 1986;Hill et al. 1987). In contrast, the CCK2-type is the predominant receptor found in the central nervous system, especially in cortical and limbic structures (Gaudreau et al. 1983;Moran et al. 1986;Pélaprat et al. 1987). On the other hand, the gastrinic receptor localized on stomach parietal cells was shown to be identical to the brain CCK2 receptor (Wank et al. 1992).Pharmacological data using selective CCK agonists or antagonists have shown that CCK receptors play an important role in anxiety and stress-related behaviors, nociception and memory processes (reviews in: Harro et al. 1993;Crawley and Corwin 1994;Shlik et al. 1997 NO . 5 CCK2 KO Mice and Behavior 691 be the differences in recognition of two affinity states for the CCK2 receptor, designated 2a and 2b (Durieux et al. 1986; Harper et al. 1999a,b) which could correspond to different couplings to G proteins of a single receptor, resulting in different intracellular events (Pommier et al. 1999) and subsequently in distinct behavioral responses (Derrien et al. 1994;Léna et al. 1999).A now currently used approach for analyzing the physiological role of a receptor is to generate, by genetic manipulations, mice invalidated for this receptor (Kieffer 1999).The behavioral profile of CCK2 receptor-deficient mice generated by gene targeting (Nagata et al. 1996;Miyasaka et al. 1999) was carried out in this work. We demonstrate that their emotional responses are not significantly different from those elicited by wild-type animals. In contrast, a motor hyperactivity, a deficit in some attention and/or memory processes, and a neurological/muscular impairment occurred in genetically modified animals. All these modifications will be discussed in terms of possible direct consequences resulting from CCK2 receptor inactivation and/or from compensatory processes due to this receptor invalidation.
METHODS
SubjectsCD1 mice (Charles River, Saint-Aubin les Elbeuf, France) (three months old) and CCK2/gastrin receptor deficientmice (three months old) coming from the original background of 129sv/C57BL/6 mice (Nagata et al. 1996) were used. Breeding and genotype analysis of the latter have been done by Transgenic Alliance (L'Arbresle, France). Male and female mice were used. They were housed (groups of 4-5 mice per cage) in the laboratory at least a week before the experiments, in a temperature (22 Ϯ 1 Њ C) and humidity (50% Ϯ 5%) controlled environment and ha...