2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-12-156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Beijing version of the montreal cognitive assessment as a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment: a community-based study

Abstract: BackgroundA cross-sectional validation study was conducted in several urban and rural communities in Beijing, China, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Beijing version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BJ) as a screening tool to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among Chinese older adults.MethodsThe MoCA-BJ and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were administered to 1001 Chinese elderly community dwellers recruited from three different regions (i.e., newly developed, old down-town, and ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
224
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
224
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in accord with several emerging studies in Chinese populations that indicate relatively lower levels of accuracy, Sn, and Sp than those previously reported [19,20,22]. Yu et al [19], conducting a study in Beijing involving a large heterogeneous population-based sample, reported a modest accuracy (AUC = 0.71) with Sn = 0.69 and Sp = 0.64 at a reduced cut-off of 22.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are in accord with several emerging studies in Chinese populations that indicate relatively lower levels of accuracy, Sn, and Sp than those previously reported [19,20,22]. Yu et al [19], conducting a study in Beijing involving a large heterogeneous population-based sample, reported a modest accuracy (AUC = 0.71) with Sn = 0.69 and Sp = 0.64 at a reduced cut-off of 22.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Since its first publication in 2005, studies have reported that the MoCA showed good-to-excellent performance in discriminating MCI from normal cognition among old people, with reported areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging between 0.82 and 0.95, a Sn from 0.79 to 0.97, and a Sp from 0.60 to 0.87 [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, a small number of studies apparently failed to show similarly high AUCs (0.71-0.79), Sn (0.65-0.69), and Sp (0.64-0.78) at least in some subpopulations [19,20,21,22], or the MoCA was shown to perform no better than the MMSE [19,22,23]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research assistants [35] score was included and used as the index for general cognitive abilities. The MoCA is more sensitive in detecting cognitive decline than the widelyused Mini-Mental State Examination [35][36][37][38] . All the research assistants and clinicians were intensively trained and high inter-rater reliability was obtained (>90%).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chinese versions of the mini mental state examination (MMSE) [13] and the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) [14] were used to evaluate global cognitive performance. The auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) was used to test auditory or verbal episodic memory.…”
Section: Sleep and Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%