2013
DOI: 10.1089/wound.2011.0317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Below-Knee Amputation: To Amputate or Palliate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent expert opinion has called into question this preference, 14,15 highlighting that 30%–50% of people with a PFA experience complications such as dehiscence, ulceration and wound failure. By comparison, these complications affect just 10%–20% of people with TTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent expert opinion has called into question this preference, 14,15 highlighting that 30%–50% of people with a PFA experience complications such as dehiscence, ulceration and wound failure. By comparison, these complications affect just 10%–20% of people with TTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to findings among vascular amputees where 85% are fitted with a prosthesis after major lower limb amputation. 21 Brown and Attinger 22 in 2013 underlined the importance of rehabilitation after amputation and further emphasised that advanced technological prosthetics have led to an improved quality of life following rehabilitation among patients with LLA. These authors, however, emphasise patient selection when considering the level of limb amputation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Currently, there is no widely accepted clinical algorithm for predicting healing outcomes following minor amputation, with the level commonly determined by the judgement of the surgical team supplemented by non-invasive clinical testing to assess the vascular status of the limb. 10 Although the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) is widely recommended as a non-invasive test for objectively assessing lower limb vascular status, 11 it can be falsely elevated in people with diabetes due to the effects of medial arterial wall calcification. 12 Furthermore ABPI does not detect lesions distal to the ankle which can also be a characteristic of diabetes-related PAD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%