2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00463.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Benefits and Costs of Inequality for the Advantaged and Disadvantaged*

Abstract: To test theoretical models intended to improve our understanding of the consequences of increased inequality for advantaged and disadvantaged populations. Copyright (c) 2007 Southwestern Social Science Association.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Americans have a relatively high elasticity of demand for housing (Voith, 2000), income growth can quickly translate into upward pressure on the price of housing and other goods and services. Distributional issues emerge when income growth is concentrated in the upper deciles of the wage distribution, raising housing and other costs for all metropolitan residents including those at the lower end of the income distribution (also see Albrecht & Albrecht, 2007). To the extent these demand shifts materialize and do so in particular places (e.g., metropolitan areas with substantial high‐wage financial and technology sectors), the impact of income inequality on costs of living should be measurable and locationally specific.…”
Section: Income and Cost‐of‐living: Are Less Equal Places More Costly?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Americans have a relatively high elasticity of demand for housing (Voith, 2000), income growth can quickly translate into upward pressure on the price of housing and other goods and services. Distributional issues emerge when income growth is concentrated in the upper deciles of the wage distribution, raising housing and other costs for all metropolitan residents including those at the lower end of the income distribution (also see Albrecht & Albrecht, 2007). To the extent these demand shifts materialize and do so in particular places (e.g., metropolitan areas with substantial high‐wage financial and technology sectors), the impact of income inequality on costs of living should be measurable and locationally specific.…”
Section: Income and Cost‐of‐living: Are Less Equal Places More Costly?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persistently affluent neighborhoods may enjoy steady or increasing investment, renovation and maintenance, and political power to help maintain their economic status (Briggs 2005;Albrecht and Albrecht 2007;Swanstrom, Dreier, and Mollenkopf 2002). Such beneficial neighborhood resources can help residents accumulate advantages over time (DiPrete and Eirich 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An affluent neighborhood can fortify its residents’ affluence by providing an infrastructure of privacy, protection, resources, and/or social networks (Durlauf ). These structural benefits contribute to a process of cumulative advantage (DiPrete and Eirich ; Albrecht and Albrecht ). As affluent residents congregate and shape their neighborhood environment, the environment in turn increases safety, residential privacy, access to leisure space, and the quality of schools and other locally provided public resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura nos muestra a Estados Unidos como una de las sociedades donde más se ha estudiado este fenómeno. Los resultados de la Encuesta sobre la Situación actual de la Población (Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2009) indican que la composición familiar se encuentra fuertemente asociada a la distribución de pobreza; trabajos como los desarrollados por Duncan y Ziol-Guest (2010), Albrecht (2007), Hoynes, Page y Huff Stevens (2006) y Manning y Lamb (2003) demuestran esta desigual distribución de pobreza y se asemejan a los obtenidos en la presente investigación.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified