1987
DOI: 10.1080/01435698.1987.9752826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Benefits and Potential Risks of Woody Legume Introductions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Legumes constitute one of the most important families of invasive plants in terms of the scope of environmental impact in habitats throughout the world (Hughes and Styles 1989;Lonsdale 1994;Cronk and Fuller 1995;Paynter et al 2003). Although access to compatible strains of nodule bacteria (rhizobia) is likely to be a critical factor governing invasion success of legumes (Richardson et al 2000;Parker 2001), biologists currently do not have a clear understanding of legume symbiotic interactions during range expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legumes constitute one of the most important families of invasive plants in terms of the scope of environmental impact in habitats throughout the world (Hughes and Styles 1989;Lonsdale 1994;Cronk and Fuller 1995;Paynter et al 2003). Although access to compatible strains of nodule bacteria (rhizobia) is likely to be a critical factor governing invasion success of legumes (Richardson et al 2000;Parker 2001), biologists currently do not have a clear understanding of legume symbiotic interactions during range expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants in the family Leguminosae rank among the most widely disseminated taxa spread to new regions by human activities (Hughes & Styles, 1989;Lonsdale, 1994;Cronk & Fuller, 1995). Although symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing nodule bacteria (rhizobia) is a key feature of legume ecology, biologists currently lack a clear understanding of symbiotic interactions during range expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of agroforestry have often found it difficult to defend their decisions from the vigorous criticisms of invasion biologists regarding the invasive potential of woody species that they promote for soil rehabilitation, reforestation, commercial production or other agronomic uses such as fallow crops (Hughes and Styles 1989;Hughes 1994;Richardson 1998;Binggeli 2001;Richardson et al 2004). Their muted response to these criticisms has been in the form of an invasive species policy published by the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF 2004) which recommends that new agroforestry introductions be subject to weediness risk assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%