The Benefits of International Co-authorship in Scientific Papers

Poirier, Julie; Johnstone, Nick; Haščič, Ivan; Silva, Jérôme

doi:10.1787/5js69ld9w9nv-en

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This method examines large volumes of documents to extract meaningful insights into the contributors and interrelations that are not noticeable by eye (Andrés, 2009;. Related bibliometric studies have focused on topics such as CSR (Lulewicz-Sas, 2017), sustainability (M. Tang et al, 2018), wind energy technologies (Poirier & Johnstone, 2015) and Fairtrade labelling (Ruggeri et al, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the socially responsible consumption gap research: Review and future research agenda

Falcão

Roseira

2022

Int J Consumer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a wide‐ranging view of the literature that is relevant to study the gaps in socially responsible consumption (SRC). The research design follows a three‐stage analytical procedure. First, we critically review the main concepts and vocabularies used in the field and propose a framework that organizes existing studies into four major types according to their approaches and focus: gap prediction, willingness ‘to go responsible’, gap understanding and barriers to SRC. Second, a qualitative content analysis provided a set of words and semantic categories for text searches in bibliographic databases. Findings showed that the Anglo‐Saxon countries lead the field, and that patterns are changing, such as the rise of China as a contributor. Finally, a bibliometric analysis of 3,367 articles, retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, identified the intellectual structure of the SRC gap literature, top contributors (countries, publications and authors), mature and emerging themes and the main barriers to SRC adoption. The 25 top journals published almost 50% of the articles and citations. The International Journal of Consumer Studies (IJCS) stands out as the only journal focused on consumer behaviour among the most prolific publications in the SRC gap literature. This finding makes the IJCS the benchmark for researchers in the field. The SRC gap research addresses five domains: clean energy, biodiversity, public safety, food‐related issues and consumer marketing research. These domains share six reasons for the SRC gaps: economic and financial factors, information and knowledge barriers, sense of effort, lack of feelings of responsibility, contextual and social factors and supply aspects. Overall, this study provides clarity into the relevant literature that helps the SRC gaps’ understanding and identifies directions for future research.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the socially responsible consumption gap research: Review and future research agenda

Falcão

Roseira

2022

Int J Consumer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The finding that non-OECD countries produce a greater number of patentable inventions when their researchers collaborate with OECD countries is confirmed by another study that combines patent and bibliometric data (Poirier et al 2015). This allows the analysis to be taken a step further and examine also knowledge spillovers between OECD and non-OECD countries that seem to benefit particularly non-OECD countries.…”

Section: Assessment Of the Determinants Of International Collaboratiomentioning

confidence: 70%

“…Data on author, affiliation, date of publication, etc. can be extracted, and counts can be developed to assess the relative innovative activity (see Meyer 2002;Poirier et al 2015).…”

Section: Measuring Environmental Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring environmental innovation using patent data

2015

OECD Environment Working Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 22-Jun-2015 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English-Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION USING PATENT DATA-ENVIRONMENT WORKING PAPER No. 89 by Ivan Haščič (1) and Mauro Migotto (1) OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed are those of the author(s).

show abstract