2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-018-0941-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Benefits of Required Forensic Clinical Experiences in Residency

Abstract: This study adds to the growing body of literature describing the benefits of expanding forensic education for residents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not surprising, the results demonstrate that most residents were not otherwise having these forensic experiences. They affirm that even relatively time-limited mandatory forensic rotations can enhance the breadth of residents' forensic exposures, in addition to increasing residents' forensic interest (Wasser et al, 2019). Further, the rotation achieved these outcomes without a typical forensic site (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While not surprising, the results demonstrate that most residents were not otherwise having these forensic experiences. They affirm that even relatively time-limited mandatory forensic rotations can enhance the breadth of residents' forensic exposures, in addition to increasing residents' forensic interest (Wasser et al, 2019). Further, the rotation achieved these outcomes without a typical forensic site (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…There is limited literature on the impact and outcomes following the implementation of new forensic clinical experiences. Two of the authors (TW, KM) developed a new mandatory forensic rotation for residents at their institution and have previously described the strategies they employed to accomplish this, as well as the rotation's positive effect on residents' interest in working with forensic patients and pursuing forensic fellowship (Michaelsen et al, 2018;Wasser et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%