1983
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4238(83)90080-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The between- and within-grape-cultivars genetic variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods of genetic variation analysis have been used with varying degrees of success. Genotyping difficulties are directly related to the genetic relationships between samples and the number of selected markers [21][22][23]. Furthermore, molecular markers have also been extensively used to discriminate among Vitis vinifera clones of the same cultivars [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods of genetic variation analysis have been used with varying degrees of success. Genotyping difficulties are directly related to the genetic relationships between samples and the number of selected markers [21][22][23]. Furthermore, molecular markers have also been extensively used to discriminate among Vitis vinifera clones of the same cultivars [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies have been performed when the inheritance of electrophoretic bands is not known ; for example, Fedak & Rajhathy (1972) in barley, Jensen et al . (1979) Stavrakakis & Loukas (1983) in Vitis etc . A word of caution seems to be necessary .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been estimated that there are more than 8,000 grape cultivars, under 24 000 different names (Viala & Vermorel, 1909). In Greece more than 300 grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) are grown and classic ampelographic (Krimbas, 1943;Davidis, 1967;Vlachos, 1986;Stavrakakis, 2010), biochemical (Stavrakakis & Loukas, 1983) and molecular methods (Stavrakakis at al., 1997;Stavrakakis & Biniari, 1998;Stavrakaki, 2008) have been used for their discrimination and classification. Among the various polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA marker techniques available, the Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) is often used, because it is ideal when the goal is the definition of identity among different clones of the same variety or among genetically close related cultivars, with positive results in differentiating grapevine cultivars and clones (Vignani et al, 2002;As far as its origin is concerned, the ampelographic characters classify Korinthiaki staphis as well as Korinthiaki lefki to proles pontica, to which most Greek grapevine varieties belong and to sub-proles balcanica (Negrul, 1938(Negrul, , 1946Levadoux, 1956).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%