1987
DOI: 10.2307/1911269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bias of a Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for heteroskedasticity, inference is based on the bias-adjusted HC3 variancecovariance matrix estimator, favored by Chesher and Jewitt (1987) and Cribari-Neto, Ferrari, and Oliveira (2005). To account for bias due to endogeneity of certain righthand-side control variables, we estimate the model using instrumental variables.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for heteroskedasticity, inference is based on the bias-adjusted HC3 variancecovariance matrix estimator, favored by Chesher and Jewitt (1987) and Cribari-Neto, Ferrari, and Oliveira (2005). To account for bias due to endogeneity of certain righthand-side control variables, we estimate the model using instrumental variables.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are valuable analytical results in Chesher and Jewitt (1987), Chesher (1989), and Chesher and Austin (1991). When the sample is balanced, with no points of high leverage, these papers find that HC1, HC2, and HCJ all tend to work quite well.…”
Section: Better Hccmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important papers whose results are related to ours include White (1980), MacKinnon and White (1985), Wu (1986), Chesher and Jewitt (1987), Shao and Wu (1987), Chesher (1989), Cribari-Neto, Ferrari, and Cordeiro (2000), Bera, Suprayitno, and Premaratne (2002), Stock and Watson (2008),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%