2022
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biasing effect of networks in the implementation of innovations

Abstract: We develop a theoretical framework about how the social network of a project leader can introduce bias in project-related decision making in the form of overvaluation. Overvaluation can increase both the likelihood of implementing projects that turn out to be successes or projects that fall below what is expected and thus turn out to be failures. We provide a deeper understanding of the contingencies under which the biasing effects of networks through overvaluation turn out to be more or less beneficial for or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we searched in the description and reviews sections for each cookbook on amazon.co.uk for any other potential awards and these included, for example, the “Guild of Food Writers Awards.” We coded awards as one if the cookbook had received one or more awards and 0 in all other cases. While it is tempting to assume that novel work is more likely to receive an award (e.g., Verhoeven et al, 2016), previous research that did differentiate the nomination for or receipt of an award from the novelty of the work finds zero (e.g., Szatmari, 2016) or even negative correlations between the two variables (e.g., Perretti & Negro, 2006). This is confirmed in our data; the correlation between novelty and awards ( r = 0.104) is nonsignificant.…”
Section: Study 1: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we searched in the description and reviews sections for each cookbook on amazon.co.uk for any other potential awards and these included, for example, the “Guild of Food Writers Awards.” We coded awards as one if the cookbook had received one or more awards and 0 in all other cases. While it is tempting to assume that novel work is more likely to receive an award (e.g., Verhoeven et al, 2016), previous research that did differentiate the nomination for or receipt of an award from the novelty of the work finds zero (e.g., Szatmari, 2016) or even negative correlations between the two variables (e.g., Perretti & Negro, 2006). This is confirmed in our data; the correlation between novelty and awards ( r = 0.104) is nonsignificant.…”
Section: Study 1: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although cognitively flexible CEOs also rely on outside information (search selection), the use of external information has a limited role in organisational AM (ibid). Additionally, Szatmari and Deichmann (2022) contend that the point of commencement of organisational decision making influences the interchange between refusing profitable opportunities and reducing the probability of accepting adverse alternatives.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%