Although attempts to [re]criminalize homosexuality in Uganda in 2014 failed, the effects and influence of this attempt linger on. The Constitutional Court ruling against the 2014 anti-homosexual law (2014 AHL), made on technical grounds other than on its substance, not only paints a misleading perception on the defeat of anti-homosexuality activism but also keeps the possibility of [re]criminalization of homosexuality alive in the country. Factors that influenced the 2014 AHL remain contextually unchallenged and continue to shape public rhetoric on homosexuality, including how the general public speaks of homosexuality and relates to LGBTIQA+ 1 communities. Violence, discrimination, evictions, and arbitrary arrests of LGBTIQA+ people are not experiences of the past, but continue to prevail in the present. As a counter response, LGBTIQA+ communities have resorted to creating safe[r] spaces, which seem to attract more hostile surveillance. Through a critical paradigm, this paper argues that the 2014 AHL was annulled only on paper but not in the perception of the public. As a consequence, surveillance over homosexuality and LGBTIQA+ communities continues in an attempt to silence gender and sexual minorities in the country.