2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Big-Fish–Little-Pond-Effect revisited: Do different types of assessments matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change is evident at many levels in education, for instance, with respect to the availability of ICT resources at schools, the access to internet, and the transition from paper-and-pencil to computer-based exams (Scherer and Siddiq 2015a;Scheuermann and Pedró 2009). Furthermore, students' digital competence has gained substantial attention and is considered to be an important twenty first century skill (Griffin et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change is evident at many levels in education, for instance, with respect to the availability of ICT resources at schools, the access to internet, and the transition from paper-and-pencil to computer-based exams (Scherer and Siddiq 2015a;Scheuermann and Pedró 2009). Furthermore, students' digital competence has gained substantial attention and is considered to be an important twenty first century skill (Griffin et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing the evaluation paradigm in the learning process is a necessity. With the development of technology, conventional assessment using paper has changed towards modern computer-based assessment (Scherer & Siddiq, 2015). Even the use of digital assessment in the language learning evaluation has exceptionally good potential and will develop (Burstein et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BFLPE primarily posits that the effect of individual student achievement on academic self‐concept is positive, whereas the effect of school‐average achievement on academic self‐concept is negative (Marsh, 1987, 2016). A growing body of research has demonstrated the validity and generalizability of the BFLPE across several countries around the world (e.g., Chiu, 2012; Liem, Marsh, Martin, McInerney, & Yeung, 2013; Marsh, 2016; Marsh, Abduljabbar, et al, 2014; Marsh et al, 2015; Marsh & Hau, 2003; Nagengast & Marsh, 2012; Scherer & Siddiq, 2015; Seaton, Marsh, & Craven, 2009). Of these studies, however, a very small body of research has specifically examined the BFLPE in the domains of mathematics achievement and mathematics self‐concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors demonstrated that the effects of class‐, stream‐, and school‐average mathematics achievement on mathematics self‐concept were significantly negative, thereby lending empirical evidence for the BFLPE on mathematics self‐concept in Singapore. Moreover, Scherer and Siddiq (2015), using the Norwegian sample of the PISA 2012 dataset, examined the BFLPE for paper‐and‐pencil and computer‐based mathematics assessments. The authors found that the BFLPE for mathematics self‐concept was significant and negative for both paper‐and‐pencil and computer‐based mathematics assessments (effect size = −0.33, −0.40, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%