2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijbis.2018.090290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The big five personality traits and their relationship with the intensity of using Facebook: a developing country perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent studies have also found that neuroticism is related to increased feelings of envy as a result of social comparisons activated by Facebook use (Chow & Wan, 2017;Wallace, James, & Warkentin, 2017). It is unclear if there is any interaction between neuroticism and user gender on Facebook use; gender was found to moderate the effect of neuroticism on number of Facebook friends and photos (Basak, Yasar, & Calisir, 2018), with emotionally stable females having more friends, and neuroticism being a stronger predictor among male than female users, but there has been no moderating impact of gender found on the effect of personality on Facebook use (El-Tah & Jaradat, 2018).…”
Section: Neuroticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have also found that neuroticism is related to increased feelings of envy as a result of social comparisons activated by Facebook use (Chow & Wan, 2017;Wallace, James, & Warkentin, 2017). It is unclear if there is any interaction between neuroticism and user gender on Facebook use; gender was found to moderate the effect of neuroticism on number of Facebook friends and photos (Basak, Yasar, & Calisir, 2018), with emotionally stable females having more friends, and neuroticism being a stronger predictor among male than female users, but there has been no moderating impact of gender found on the effect of personality on Facebook use (El-Tah & Jaradat, 2018).…”
Section: Neuroticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is acceptable for two reasons. The composite reliabilities are higher than 0.6 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981) and the study was conducted for the first time employing a new model (El-Tah & Jaradat, 2018;Lee, 2012;Ping, 2009). Hence, the measurement model is an acceptable fit to the data from the sample and the seven-factor model, and it is possible to identify the relations between each pair of constructs.…”
Section: Measurement Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%