1978
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90172-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The binding of skeletal muscle C-protein to F-actin, and its relation to the interaction of actin with myosin subfragment-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
162
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
162
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A determinant of isometric force is the duty ratio, defined as the myosin attachment time divided by the total cycle time (i.e., time of the ATP hydrolysis cycle). As maximal isometric force is unaffected by cMyBP-C, this would suggest that the ATP hydrolysis rate is likely slowed [5] accordingly so that the duty ratio is preserved in the presence of cMyBP-C. Why this is not the case at submaximal calcium levels where force is reduced in the presence of cMyBP-C is a matter of speculation. As crossbridge kinetics are differentially affected by load and the degree of calcium activation [50], these data would suggest that cross-bridge number and kinetics are likely responsible for the differential effect of cMyBP-C on both force and velocity at submaximal calcium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A determinant of isometric force is the duty ratio, defined as the myosin attachment time divided by the total cycle time (i.e., time of the ATP hydrolysis cycle). As maximal isometric force is unaffected by cMyBP-C, this would suggest that the ATP hydrolysis rate is likely slowed [5] accordingly so that the duty ratio is preserved in the presence of cMyBP-C. Why this is not the case at submaximal calcium levels where force is reduced in the presence of cMyBP-C is a matter of speculation. As crossbridge kinetics are differentially affected by load and the degree of calcium activation [50], these data would suggest that cross-bridge number and kinetics are likely responsible for the differential effect of cMyBP-C on both force and velocity at submaximal calcium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein consists of 11 domains (C0-C10), 8 immunoglobulin I-like and 3 fibronectin type 3 motifs, with putative binding of specific domains to the myosin tail (domain C10) [1], titin (domains C8-C10) [2], myosin sub-fragment 2 (S2, domains C1-C2) [3,4], and actin (domains C0-C1) [5,6]. Furthermore, while sedimentation studies indicate that cMyBP-C does not bind to myosin subfragment 1 (S1) [3], the C0-C1 domains may interact with the myosin head and affect contractile function [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to binding to myosin, MyBP-C also interacts with actin (12) and with thin filaments (13) via its N-terminal region (9, 10, 14-17; cf. 18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is present not only in cardiac muscle, but also in skeletal muscle before the skeletal muscle-type isoforms are expressed, suggesting that the cardiac isoform is functional in early myofibrillogenesis and regenerating muscle (2,3). cMyBP-C may modulate myosin assembly (4) and stabilize thick filaments (5). It binds titin via domains C8-C10 (6) and actin in the Pro-Alarich sequences between the C0 and C1 domains (7), which appear to be important for the precise arrangement of the actin-myosin filaments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%