1992
DOI: 10.2307/416944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Binding Theory Module: Evidence from First Language Acquisition for Principle C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lust (in preparation); ). These results, taken together, corroborate the proposal that there exists a preprogrammed and universal "structuredependence" in first language acquisition (Lust, Eisele, and Mazuka (1992)). The structure-dependence is principled; yet, the application of the related principles is modulated by phrase structure parameter-setting (cf.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lust (in preparation); ). These results, taken together, corroborate the proposal that there exists a preprogrammed and universal "structuredependence" in first language acquisition (Lust, Eisele, and Mazuka (1992)). The structure-dependence is principled; yet, the application of the related principles is modulated by phrase structure parameter-setting (cf.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…An interaction of principles and parameters in UG constrains children's early hypotheses about their grammar. (See Lust, Eisele, and Mazuka (1992) for a review of evidence that knowledge of Principle C appears early in acquisition. See Lust (to appear, in preparation) for theoretical arguments with regard to this proposal; and Mazuka (in press) for discussion of this proposal and evidence that knowledge of CP parameterization may appear early, perhaps before the first word.)…”
Section: Precedence Effects In Acquisition: Parameterization Of Chinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A great deal of work in developmental psycholinguistics has been devoted to the study of anaphoric relations, that is, relations holding between a pronominal form and an antecedent in which the interpretation of the former depends on the interpretation of the latter (e.g., Chien and Wexler (1990), Crain and McKee (1986), Jakubowicz (1984), Lust, Eisele, and Mazuka (1992), among others). Less attention has been devoted to the emergence of "reconstruction" effects involving pronouns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%