2020
DOI: 10.1093/botlinnean/boaa044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biogeography of the megadiverse genusAnthurium(Araceae)

Abstract: The tropics of the New World are a biodiversity hotspot, the genus Anthurium being an example of a megadiverse taxon with currently > 1000 described species. In this study, we provide detailed information on species distributions and analyse patterns of diversity and endemism, with a particular focus on the comparison of epiphytic and terrestrial congenerics. Using a dataset of occurrence records for 1041 Anthurium spp. (c. 98% of the genus), we modelled geographical species distributions using climate-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, epiphytes have long been reported to have larger geographic ranges than terrestrial species (Schimper, 1888) based largely on studies conducted before the availability of modern large‐scale databases of plant occurrence records (e.g. Ibisch et al, 1996; Kessler, 2002; Schimper, 1888), although a recent study focused on the Araceae genus Anthurium also supports the claim (Reimuth & Zotz, 2020). This apparent contradiction is intriguing, although rarely highlighted in the literature (but see Kreft et al, 2004), and merits further investigation based on updated sources of evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, epiphytes have long been reported to have larger geographic ranges than terrestrial species (Schimper, 1888) based largely on studies conducted before the availability of modern large‐scale databases of plant occurrence records (e.g. Ibisch et al, 1996; Kessler, 2002; Schimper, 1888), although a recent study focused on the Araceae genus Anthurium also supports the claim (Reimuth & Zotz, 2020). This apparent contradiction is intriguing, although rarely highlighted in the literature (but see Kreft et al, 2004), and merits further investigation based on updated sources of evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…orchids, Tillandsioideae bromeliads) and fleshy fruits dispersed by birds and bats (e.g. aroids, Bromelioideae bromeliads, Peperomia ) to greater distances compared to ground level (Einzmann & Zotz, 2017; Fischer & Araujo, 1995; Kessous et al, 2022; Reimuth & Zotz, 2020; Thomson et al, 2011). Second, the stressful and extreme environmental conditions of the epiphytic habitat would require greater eco‐physiological plasticity (Ibisch et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the orchid genus Galeandra, epiphytic species tended towards smaller range size than terrestrial counterparts 16 . In contrast, epiphytic Anthurium species had mean range size eight times larger than terrestrial species in the genus 17 . Analyses of angiosperms in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest showed epiphytes having among the highest percentages of small-ranged species among lifeforms 1,18 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although seed weight in epiphytes follows a bimodal distribution (consistent with the hypothesis that light wind-dispersed and heavier, fleshy bird-dispersed seeds are both effective for tree-to-tree dispersal), epiphytes do not generally have smaller seeds than confamilial terrestrial plants, evidence that closely related epiphytic and terrestrial taxa exhibit similar traits 47 . However, dispersal of anemochorous seeds is likely more successful from greater heights in the canopy than from the ground, thereby predisposing epiphytic taxa to larger ranges than morphologically-similar, closely related terrestrial taxa 17 . Bird-dispersed epiphyte seeds may also reach greater distances if canopy-inhabiting birds and bats forage over greater distances than forest-floor birds 14,44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation