1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02653862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bioleaching of different sulfide concentrates using thermophilic bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) is also the most important copper ore mineral and several studies have assessed the efficiency of Cu extraction, for example by increasing oxidation through Downloaded by [University of Massachusetts] at 07:57 03 January 2015 addition of Ag + ions and/or bioleaching with bacteria (Juarez et al 2006;Munoz et al 1998;Qiu et al 2000;Rodriguez et al 2003;Stott et al 2003;Third et al 2000;Torres et al 1995;Watling 2006). Bioleaching of low-grade chalcopyrite ores has the advantage of using less energy compared to conventional metallurgical methods and it is more environmentally friendly (Xia et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) is also the most important copper ore mineral and several studies have assessed the efficiency of Cu extraction, for example by increasing oxidation through Downloaded by [University of Massachusetts] at 07:57 03 January 2015 addition of Ag + ions and/or bioleaching with bacteria (Juarez et al 2006;Munoz et al 1998;Qiu et al 2000;Rodriguez et al 2003;Stott et al 2003;Third et al 2000;Torres et al 1995;Watling 2006). Bioleaching of low-grade chalcopyrite ores has the advantage of using less energy compared to conventional metallurgical methods and it is more environmentally friendly (Xia et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, thermophile microorganisms, such as Sulfolobus, Acidianus and Metallosphaera have been shown to leach chalcopyrite to high extractions at temperatures in the range 65-75°C (Konishi et al, 1999;Torres et al, 1995;Howard and Crundwell, 1999), both in shake flasks and stirred tanks. The success of thermophiles over mesophiles has not yet been clearly explained, but it has been observed that thermophile leaching takes place in a fairly low potential environment (380-500 mV Ag/AgCl) in which chalcopyrite passivation is not observed (Petersen et al, 2001;Gerike et al, 2001;Third et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers (Konishi et al, 1999;Torress et al, 1995, and Ho ward and Gu indwell 1999) reported that thermophile macroorganism such as sulfolobus acidiamus and metallosphaera have been shown to leach chalcopyrite to high extraction at temperature range 65 -75 o C, both in shakes flask and stirred tanks. The success of thermophile over mesophiles has not yet been clearly explained, but it has been observed that thermophile leaching takes place in a fairly low potential environ ment (380 -500 mV Ag/AgCl) in wh ich chalcopyrite passivation is not observed (Petersen et The experiments verify the enhancement due to chloride and surfactant addition in the leaching system of chalcopyrite and H2SO4.…”
Section: Microbi Al Leaching Studies On Chalcopyritementioning
confidence: 99%