2005
DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200501000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Biology of Bone Grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
562
2
40

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 739 publications
(606 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
562
2
40
Order By: Relevance
“…Mosca, in 1995 [21], described the use of tricortical iliac crest allograft for calcaneal lengthening. Vining et al [35] reported that corticocancellous autograft bone and allograft bone do not differ significantly and concluded that the main advantage of structural allograft is that they are highly resistant to compressive load failure while allowing for loadbearing after surgery [18]. Moreover, Myerson et al [22] reported successful union after calcaneal osteotomy with fresh-frozen structural allograft in 11 feet with an average time to union of 10 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mosca, in 1995 [21], described the use of tricortical iliac crest allograft for calcaneal lengthening. Vining et al [35] reported that corticocancellous autograft bone and allograft bone do not differ significantly and concluded that the main advantage of structural allograft is that they are highly resistant to compressive load failure while allowing for loadbearing after surgery [18]. Moreover, Myerson et al [22] reported successful union after calcaneal osteotomy with fresh-frozen structural allograft in 11 feet with an average time to union of 10 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our treatment approach was based on current evidence that autograft contains osteoprogenitor cells and osteoinductive factors and also provides some osteoconductive scaffolding properties [17,31] and on the hypothesis that BMP-7 may enhance the osteoinductive capacity of the ABG [9,23,27,38]. In patients with bone defects, the concept was to use BMP-7 as a powerful osteoinductive agent and the ABG as a graft expander.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Although the literature contains many reports describing the use of a myriad of bone substitutes, including allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts, autologous bone graft has been shown to be the only "material" to possess the three fundamental properties ("regenerative triad") of an ideal graft: osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction. [18][19][20][21] For this reason, autologous bone graft remains the gold standard for biologic management of alveolar ridge augmentation despite the risk of donor site morbidity and graft resorbtion. [18][19][20][21] Since its first applications to alveolar bone at the end of the 1980s and beginning of the 1990s, Bio-Oss (Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland), a deproteinized bovine bone substitute, is, by far, the most commonly used xenograft.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21] For this reason, autologous bone graft remains the gold standard for biologic management of alveolar ridge augmentation despite the risk of donor site morbidity and graft resorbtion. [18][19][20][21] Since its first applications to alveolar bone at the end of the 1980s and beginning of the 1990s, Bio-Oss (Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland), a deproteinized bovine bone substitute, is, by far, the most commonly used xenograft. It may be used alone or mixed with cancellous autogenous bone for the reconstruction of limited horizontal alveolar ridge defects, for subantral bone augmentation as part of sinus lift procedures, for periodontal regeneration, and for the healing of extraction sockets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%