2007
DOI: 10.4141/p06-071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biology of Canadian weeds. 134. Bromus inermis Leyss

Abstract: Otfinowski, R., Kenkel, N. C. and Catling, P. M. 2007. The biology of Canadian weeds. 134. Bromus inermis Leyss. Can. J. Plant Sci. 87: [183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198]. Smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.), a native of central Eurasia, was introduced to Canada as a forage and hay crop around 1888. Early reports of plants escaped from cultivation appear in 1903, and based on the number of collections prior to 1920, smooth brome spread most rapidly in western Cana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
3
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rhizome production is affected by similar processes to those that affect seed production, such as nutrient availability and interspecific competition (Otfinowski et al 2007), and is also sensitive to changes in light intensity and quality, with tiller density increasing with increasing light intensity (Biligetu and Coulman 2010). Light conditions may have differed among the treatments, although this variable was not measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhizome production is affected by similar processes to those that affect seed production, such as nutrient availability and interspecific competition (Otfinowski et al 2007), and is also sensitive to changes in light intensity and quality, with tiller density increasing with increasing light intensity (Biligetu and Coulman 2010). Light conditions may have differed among the treatments, although this variable was not measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many introduced forages including Kentucky bluegrass (Peterson et al, 1979) and smooth brome (Otfinowski et al, 2007), both common species within seeded grasslands of the present study, are known to possess shallow, creeping rooted morphologies, and may reduce the quality of habitat for soil organisms at deeper depths. Conversely, increased rooting in shallow layers may favour those organisms that prefer the shallow soil profile (van Eekeren et al, 2008), and account for the limited difference in bait lamina removal between vegetation types in this soil layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, brome has escaped from its planted habitats and become established in native remnant prairies (D'Antonio and Vitousek 1992). At present, smooth brome has received little attention as an invasive species (but see Blankespoor and Larson 1994), despite the fact that its invasive status has been often noted (Cronin 2007;Haynes and Cronin 2003;Otfinowski et al 2007;Williams and Crone 2006). For instance, Williams and Crone (2006) developed a demographic model based on natural patches that indicated smooth brome is capable of slowing the growth and promoting the extinction of native Anemone patens (Pasque flower) patches.…”
Section: Invasive Smooth Bromementioning
confidence: 97%
“…These data were used to determine if the amount of neighboring brome was correlated with the growth rates of cordgrass patches. We chose a distance of 1 m because smooth brome and prairie cordgrass are capable of spreading by this distance during a single growing season (Otfinowski et al 2007;USDA and NRCS 2008). Therefore, competitive interactions are likely to take place within this buffer area.…”
Section: Vegetation Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%