“…To prevent NH 4 + toxicity, many macrophytes decrease NH 4 + accumulation by incorporating it into free amino acids (FAA) and amines and/or by actively transporting it out of plant cells, which are processes requiring carbon (C) as energy and C-skeleton for FAA synthesis (Britto et al, 2001;Britto and Kronzucker 2002;Cao et al, 2009a), leading to imbalance of CN metabolism under NH 4 + stress, e.g., increases in NH 4 N and FAA and decreases in soluble carbohydrate (SC) and starch (Cao et al, 2009b;Zhang et al, 2010;Yuan et al, 2013). The effect of NH 4 + enrichment on plants depends on the C reserves, e.g., sufficient C reserves alleviated negative effects of NH 4 + enrichment on Zostera noltii and Potamogeton crispus (Brun et al, 2002;Cao et al, 2009b In this study, the submersed macrophytes Myriophyllum spicatum L. and Ceratophyllum demersum L. were used to test effects of NH 4 + pulse on their C and N metabolism, because (1) these species distributed worldwide and inhabit waters ranging from mesotrophic-to eutrophic-conditions (Aiken et al, 1979;Smith and Barko 1990;Mjelde and Faafeng 1997); (2) they prefer NH 4 + over NO 3 − (Nichols and Keeney 1976;Best 1980), and require a considerable quantity of N for biomass production (Goulder and Boatman 1971;Wersal and Madsen 2011); and (3) they represent two kinds of strategies in resource use (Poorter and Bongers 2006;Sterck et al, 2011), with M. spicatum having an acquisitive strategy and higher growth rate (Fu et al, 2012) and C. demersum having a conservative strategy, with a more conservative C use and higher tress tolerance (Yuan et al, 2013;Zhong et al, 2013).…”