2015
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The BioMart community portal: an innovative alternative to large, centralized data repositories

Abstract: The BioMart Community Portal (www.biomart.org) is a community-driven effort to provide a unified interface to biomedical databases that are distributed worldwide. The portal provides access to numerous database projects supported by 30 scientific organizations. It includes over 800 different biological datasets spanning genomics, proteomics, model organisms, cancer data, ontology information and more. All resources available through the portal are independently administered and funded by their host organizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
550
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 694 publications
(562 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
550
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the proportion of genes encoding signaling ligands in genomes (Table 4.2), we used the BioMart portal from Ensembl (Smedley et al 2015). All the genes, which have both the following Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, "receptor binding" (Molecular Function, GO:0005102) and "extracellular region" (Cellular Component, GO:0005576), were considered as ligand genes.…”
Section: Methods: Construction Of Gephebase and Identification Of Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the proportion of genes encoding signaling ligands in genomes (Table 4.2), we used the BioMart portal from Ensembl (Smedley et al 2015). All the genes, which have both the following Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, "receptor binding" (Molecular Function, GO:0005102) and "extracellular region" (Cellular Component, GO:0005576), were considered as ligand genes.…”
Section: Methods: Construction Of Gephebase and Identification Of Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a set of 10,243 genes annotated as orthologs in the six species according to Ensembl (BioMart v. 0.9) (Supplemental Table S3; Smedley et al 2015) and used 5% false-discovery rate (FDR; Benjamini-Hochberg) (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995) as our multiple-testing-corrected significance threshold. The overall analysis included five comparisons: (1) human versus each of the other five species, (2) human-specific differential expression (human vs. other five primates grouped together), (3) ape-specific differential expression (human + chimpanzee vs. other four primates), (4) Catarrhini-specific differential expression (human + chimpanzee + rhesus macaque vs. other primates), and (5) comparison between Haplorrhini (human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, and marmoset) and Strepsirrhini (mouse lemur and bushbaby).…”
Section: Differential Gene Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sequences were downloaded using BioMart (Smedley et al, 2015) and loaded into Mesquite version 3.03 (Maddison and Maddison, 2015), where they were aligned using ClustalW version 2.1 (Larkin et al, 2007). FastTree version 2.1.7 (Price et al, 2010) was used to create an approximate maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree from the aligned sequences.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses and In Silico Analysis Of Expression Datamentioning
confidence: 99%