2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.09.418442
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biophysical basis of protein domain compatibility

Abstract: Understanding the biophysical mechanisms that govern the combination of protein domains into viable proteins is essential for advancing synthetic biology and biomedical engineering. Here, we use massively parallel genotype/phenotype assays to determine cell surface expression of over 300,000 variants of the inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.1 recombined with hundreds of protein motifs. We use machine learning to derive a quantitative biophysical model and practical rules for domain recombination. Insertional fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cα B factors were obtained from the crystal structure for each residue in MtrA using the Biopython Bio.PDB package , and averaged for the residue preceding and the residue following each insertion site. Per-residue stiffness estimates were obtained from a Cα anisotropic network model of the entire MtrCAB complex (without hemes) using the ProDy suite, , based on previously described protocols. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cα B factors were obtained from the crystal structure for each residue in MtrA using the Biopython Bio.PDB package , and averaged for the residue preceding and the residue following each insertion site. Per-residue stiffness estimates were obtained from a Cα anisotropic network model of the entire MtrCAB complex (without hemes) using the ProDy suite, , based on previously described protocols. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per-residue stiffness estimates were obtained from a Cα anisotropic network model of the entire MtrCAB complex (without hemes) using the ProDy suite, 47,48 based on previously described protocols. 44,49 Statistics. All error bars represent ±1 standard deviation calculated from three or more biological replicates.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per-residue stiffness estimates were obtained from a Cα anisotropic network model of the entire MtrCAB complex (without hemes) using the ProDy suite, 71, 72 based on previously described protocols. 68, 73…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per-residue stiffness estimates were obtained from a Cα anisotropic network model of the entire MtrCAB complex (without hemes) using the ProDy suite, 71,72 based on previously described protocols. 68,73 Statistics. All error bars represent ±1 standard deviation calculated from three or more biological replicates.…”
Section: Moo3 Nanoparticle Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%