2007
DOI: 10.1086/518782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Blast Wave of Tycho’s Supernova Remnant

Abstract: We use the Chandra X-Ray Observatory to study the region in the Tycho supernova remnant between the blast wave and the shocked ejecta interface or contact discontinuity. This zone contains all the history of the shock-heated gas and cosmic-ray acceleration in the remnant. We present for the first time evidence for significant spatial variations of the X-ray synchrotron emission in the form of spectral steepening from a photon index of $2.6 right at the blast wave to a value of $3.0 several arcseconds behind. W… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

32
184
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
32
184
1
Order By: Relevance
“…account (Fig. 3), results in a bremsstrahlung emission peaked around 1.2 keV, which, at its maximum, contributes only about 6% of the total X-ray continuum emission only, in agreement with the findings of Cassam-Chenaï et al (2007). In the same energy range, there is however a non-negligible contribution from several emission lines, which increases their intensity moving inwards from the FS, where the X-ray emission is mainly nonthermal (Warren et al 2005).…”
Section: R R Shsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…account (Fig. 3), results in a bremsstrahlung emission peaked around 1.2 keV, which, at its maximum, contributes only about 6% of the total X-ray continuum emission only, in agreement with the findings of Cassam-Chenaï et al (2007). In the same energy range, there is however a non-negligible contribution from several emission lines, which increases their intensity moving inwards from the FS, where the X-ray emission is mainly nonthermal (Warren et al 2005).…”
Section: R R Shsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The projected X-ray emission profile, computed at 1 keV, is shown in Fig. 9, where it is compared with the Chandra data in the region that Cassam-Chenaï et al (2007) call region W. The resulting radial profile, already convoluted with the Chandra PSF of about 0.5 arcsec, shows a remarkable agreement with the data. As widely stated above, the sharp decrease in the emission behind the FS is due to the rapid synchrotron losses of the electrons in a magnetic field as large as ∼300 μG.…”
Section: R R Shmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, the mechanisms leading to both the magnetic field amplification and the electron injection at the SNR shock and their respective efficiencies remain poorly constrained. To investigate these processes observationally, there have been detailed studies, mostly in X-rays, of some selected SNRs (see e.g., Cassam-Chenaï et al 2007;Cassam-Chenaï et al 2008, and references therein). Relevant, complementary information should also be extracted from a statistical analysis of SNR data samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two interpretations have been proposed to account for this filamentary emission: either the magnetic field is large enough (≃ 100 µG) to induce strong radiative losses in the high energy electrons , or the magnetic field is damped at the shock (Pohl, Yan & Lazarian 2005). Both models predict different synchrotron morphologies and spectral shapes in X-rays (Cassam-Chenaï et al 2007).…”
Section: Electron Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%