This is an author-produced, peer-reviewed version of this article. The final, definitive version of this document can be found online at Critical Sociology, published by SAGE. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.1177/0896920510378768This is an author-produced, peer-reviewed version of this article. The final, definitive version of this document can be found online at Critical Sociology, published by SAGE. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.
AbstractResponding to calls to return racial analysis to indigenous Latin America, this article moves beyond the prejudicial attitudes of dominant groups to specify how native subordination gets perpetuated as a normal outcome of the organization of society. I argue that a naturalized system of indirect rule racially subordinates native populations through creating the position of mestizo "authoritarian intermediary." Natives must depend on these cultural brokers for their personhood, while maintaining this privileged position requires facilitating indigenous exploitation. Institutional structures combine with cultural practices to generate a vicious cycle in which increased village intermediary success increases native marginalization. This racialized social structure explains my ethnographic findings that indigenous villagers continued to support the same coterie of mestizos despite their regular and sometimes extreme acts of peculation. My findings about the primacy of race suggest new directions for research into indigenous studies, ethnic mobilizations, and the global dimensions of racial domination.Key Words: Racialization, Peru, indigenous peoples, subjugation, colonialism, indirect rule, ethnography, race and ethnicity.While recent studies have uncovered a sophisticated persistence in anti-indigenous racist attitudes in Latin America, racism's explanatory power remains dramatically untapped. In particular, understanding indigenous people's persistent subordination requires moving beyond the bigotry of dominant populations to focus instead on explaining the sources of durable inequality. For, despite recent mass mobilizations, indigenous populations remain "the most exploited, oppressed, and politically excluded groups in society" (Otero, 2003: 249). A recent study by the World Bank (2005) shows that in Peru (2004), for example, 63% of indigenous households live in poverty as compared to 43% of non-indigenous households.
1Racial analyses of the 1970s and 1980s made trenchant contributions about the particular economic articulation that marginalized indigenous populations, but was criticized for being an extension of class analysis and essentializing culture (Fuenzalida, 1970;Hall, 1980;Wolpe, 1980;Wade, 1997;de la Cadena, 2000). Subsequent ethnic analyses looked directly at indigenous social interactions, providing great insight into new and powerful forms of indigenous self-representation. Yet these works frequently noted the barriers of racism without having the theoretical framework to explain them (Omi and Winant, 1994;Wade, 1997;Warren and Jackson, ...