2006
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2006.17.1-2.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Boundary Vector Cell Model of Place Cell Firing and Spatial Memory

Abstract: We review evidence for the boundary vector cell model of the environmental determinants of the firing of hippocampal place cells. Preliminary experimental results are presented concerning the effects of addition or removal of environmental boundaries on place cell firing and evidence that boundary vector cells may exist in the subiculum. We review and update computational simulations predicting the location of human search within a virtual environment of variable geometry, assuming that boundary vector cells p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
430
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(461 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
27
430
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The view-based approach to the study of place-sensitive activity in the hippocampal formation provides an alternative to other approaches that require calculation of distances to environmental boundaries (Barry et al, 2006;Hartley, Burgess, Lever, Cacucci, & Keefe, 2000) or landmark detection (Sharp, 1991;Touretzky & Redish, 1996). Moreover, the view-based explanation of geometry-related effects is biologically more plausible than the explanation involving a dedicated brain module for geometry processing (Cheng, 1986;Cheng & Newcombe, 2005;Hermer & Spelke, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The view-based approach to the study of place-sensitive activity in the hippocampal formation provides an alternative to other approaches that require calculation of distances to environmental boundaries (Barry et al, 2006;Hartley, Burgess, Lever, Cacucci, & Keefe, 2000) or landmark detection (Sharp, 1991;Touretzky & Redish, 1996). Moreover, the view-based explanation of geometry-related effects is biologically more plausible than the explanation involving a dedicated brain module for geometry processing (Cheng, 1986;Cheng & Newcombe, 2005;Hermer & Spelke, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it is not known how these cells interact with other cell types in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. Cells with boundary-related activity have previously been reported in the subiculum (Sharp, 1999b;Barry et al, 2006), one synapse downstream of the hippocampus and one synapse upstream of the entorhinal cortex, but the reports are still anecdotic and the number of border cells with high S/N ratios in this area is apparently extremely low (n 2 in Barry et al, 2006;0 in Henriksen et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Extended Mapmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Head direction cells had previously been observed in a number of brain systems, from the dorsal tegmental nucleus in the brain stem to the pre-and parasubiculum in the parahippocampal cortex (Ranck 1985;Taube et al 1990;Taube 2007). Border cells were described at the same time in the subiculum (Barry et al 2006;Lever et al 2009). Thus, by the end of the first decade of the new millennium, it was clear that place and grid cells were part of a diverse and entangled network of cell types with distinct functions in spatial representation.…”
Section: Upstream Of Place Cells: Grid Cells and Other Cell Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%