2002
DOI: 10.1108/f.2002.20.10.350.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Boundaryless Organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The new structure is not bureaucratic, but can be adjusted based on the needs and trust levels of the organizations. Eventually, the collaborations can lead to permeable, trusting organizations (Ashkenas et al, 2002). This is intrinsically the goal of agile manifesto.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new structure is not bureaucratic, but can be adjusted based on the needs and trust levels of the organizations. Eventually, the collaborations can lead to permeable, trusting organizations (Ashkenas et al, 2002). This is intrinsically the goal of agile manifesto.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sementara tujuan organisasi harus dibuat secara efisien dan efektif sehingga dengan penempatan PR yang tepat pada struktur organisasi, dapat mendukung arah gerak dan kinerja PR di organisasi (Ashkenas, Ulrich, Jick, & Kerr, 2002). Untuk itu, PR seharusnya ditempatkan pada level atas di dalam suatu organisasi atau level strategis (Cutlip, dkk, 1978).…”
Section: Posisi Humas Pemerintah Daerahunclassified
“…A legitimate question with regard to the above is whether it makes a positive difference if the Luhmannian notion of organizational boundary is added to the CCO perspective. First, in a paper that builds on Luhmann’s ideas (1995), Schreyögg and Sydow (in press) put forward the argument that conceptualizations of the “boundaryless organization” (e.g., Ashkenas, Ulrich, Jick, & Kerr, 2002) displace the fundamentals of theory development on organizations. They go on to argue that the notion of the organizational boundary and identity is essential to grasp an organization’s inherent historicity.…”
Section: A Processual Notion Of Organization But Within Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%