“…Shifting modes of commemoration promoted by the state and its actors play out through landscapes such as those of Bulgarian memorialization to the Great War (Dimitrova, 2005) and Finnish state memorialization practices to the dead of the Second World War (Raivo, 2004). Debate continues to revolve around the development of landscapes of varying degrees of permanency through the interplay of private grief, personal reflection, public expressions of militarism and national narratives of identity (Inglis, 1998;Jenkings et al, 2012;Johnson, 1999Johnson, , 2003Lomsky-Feder, 2005;Managhan, 2012;Moriarty, 1997;Tarlow, 1999;Walklate et al, 2011). The reconfiguration of the National Mall in Washington DC through the military-security apparatus of urban control and surveillance, and the military-memory apparatus of the new(ish) Second World War memorial monument both illustrate this well (see Benton-Short, 2006Doss, 2008).…”