2020
DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The breadth and potency of transdiagnostic cognitive risks for psychopathology in youth.

Abstract: Objective: Multiple cognitive risks from different theoretical paradigms (dysfunctional attitudes, negative inferential style, self-criticism, dependency, brooding) predict depression, but may be transdiagnostic vulnerabilities for multiple psychopathologies. Risk factors can be identified as broadly transdiagnostic and relatively specific to psychopathological outcomes by organizing the common and specific aspects of each respective construct using latent bifactor models, and by examining links between dimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a joint model, depressive symptoms and somatization but not anxiety symptoms explained a unique proportion of variance in self-directed passive-aggressive behaviour. This was in line with the assumption that self-directed passive-aggressive behaviour may show associations with general psychological symptom burden and other symptom categories than depression as these share transdiagnostic cognitive risk factors [ 42 ]. However, the unique amount of variance accounted for by depression was the largest supporting its particular importance for depression.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In a joint model, depressive symptoms and somatization but not anxiety symptoms explained a unique proportion of variance in self-directed passive-aggressive behaviour. This was in line with the assumption that self-directed passive-aggressive behaviour may show associations with general psychological symptom burden and other symptom categories than depression as these share transdiagnostic cognitive risk factors [ 42 ]. However, the unique amount of variance accounted for by depression was the largest supporting its particular importance for depression.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Alternative approaches other than HiToP favor a bifactor structure where lower-order dimensions are not nested within broader higher-order factors, but instead explain unique residual variance that is not accounted for by the higher-order constructs (e.g., Caspi et al, 2014; Lahey et al, 2012; Snyder, Young, & Hankin, 2017). The breadth of ambition varies across dimensional approaches, with HiToP aspiring eventually to guide clinical assessment and intervention (Ruggero et al, 2019) and accommodate dimensions of personality as well as developmental trajectories, including cognitive risk dimensions (Kotov et al, 2017; Schweizer, Snyder, Young, & Hankin, 2020), whereas other approaches are somewhat narrower in scope (Craddock & Owen, 2010).…”
Section: Transdiagnostic Approaches To Classifying Mental Health Prob...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the absence of a framework and validated measures to assess posttraumatic sequelae other than PTSD symptoms, clinicians and researchers have had no systematic way to identify the children who could benefit from trauma-focused services but who do not meet criteria for PTSD. The symptom complexity and burden introduced by extensive psychiatric comorbidity further complicates the challenge, often obscuring posttraumatic symptoms that do not fit the PTSD criteria but that transdiagnostic researchers and theorists have identified as crucial treatment targets due to serving as a link between childhood adversity and psychopathology (McLaughlin et al, 2020;Schweizer et al, 2020;Weissman et al, 2020). DTD provides an efficient yet systematic clinical framework and a validated measure (Stanton et al, 2020) to guide the provision of evidence-based trauma-focused treatment (Ford, Blaustein, Habib, & Kagan, 2013) or children and adolescents with complex developmental trauma histories and psychiatric comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second DTD domain, cognitive/ behavioural dysregulation (Criterion C), includes symptoms referencing cognitive/attentional preoccupation with threat (McLaughlin et al, 2020;Weissman et al, 2020) and behavioural disinhibition/dyscontrol associated with impaired executive functions and effortful control (Beauchaine & Cicchetti, 2019;Hankin et al, 2017;Huang-Pollock, Shapiro, Galloway-Long, & Weigard, 2017;Santens, Claes, Dierckx, & Dom, 2020;Snyder, Friedman, & Hankin, 2019;Wade et al, 2020). The third DTD domain, relational/identity dysregulation (Criterion D), includes avoidant and aggressive modes of relational engagement and social information processing (McLaughlin et al, 2020;Schweizer, Snyder, Young, & Hankin, 2020), disorganized attachment working models and rejection sensitivity (Foxhall, Hamilton-Giachritsis, & Button, 2019;Snyder et al, 2019), and extreme selfdevaluation and self-ideal discrepancy (Mason et al, 2019;Schweizer et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%