2013
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both have embraced markets, but far from limiting their government much of their economic success is attributable to active state intervention. On the external front though trade barriers have been torn down, policy makers in both countries have not shied away from employing selective protection and regulation for strategic purposes (Ban and Blyth, 2013;McCartney, 2010). But underlying these similarities there are far reaching contrasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both have embraced markets, but far from limiting their government much of their economic success is attributable to active state intervention. On the external front though trade barriers have been torn down, policy makers in both countries have not shied away from employing selective protection and regulation for strategic purposes (Ban and Blyth, 2013;McCartney, 2010). But underlying these similarities there are far reaching contrasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dificuldade em compreender até que ponto o Consenso de Washington é contestado pelos emergentes reside na adesão aos princípios macroeconômicos pré-determinados e às condicionalidades aceitas para obtenção de recursos internacionais. O Consenso de Washington não foi só um conjunto de proposições para estabilização da econômica; as recomendações disseminam uma cultura político-econômica neoliberal financista que condensa a natureza da hegemonia da fase contemporânea do capitalismo (BAN;BLYTH, 2013).…”
Section: Limites E Potencialidades De Transformação Da Ordemunclassified
“…Thus, we can acknowledge that neoliberalism informs the dominant mode of economic thinking, but understand that it does not operate as a rigid script -simply copied and reproduced -across different locations. Instead, it is flexible and open to local adaption and interpretation (Peck and Theodore, 2013;Mirowski, 2013;Ban and Blyth, 2013;Schmidt and Thatcher, 2013;Ban, 2016). As such, the role of the State is to translate the global script of neoliberalism into local language that can then be applied and understood in a given region.…”
Section: Neoliberalism Financialization and The Development Of 'Finmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant and global scripts (e.g. those espoused by World Trade Organisation and the World Bank about the importance of liberalization and flexibility of labour markets) are translated by the State at a local level, and this takes the form of policies and regulations, which then go on to shape the organization of political and social life (Ban, 2016). Moreover, the translation of neoliberalism in any local contexts reflects the intellectual history of that region, naturally encapsulating the local struggle for ideas and resources, and leading to varieties of neoliberalism (Eagleton, 2007;Ban, 2016).…”
Section: Neoliberalism Financialization and The Development Of 'Finmentioning
confidence: 99%