2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12178-013-9189-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bright future for total ankle replacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) is the most common device used in the United States and was the first device to receive approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prior to 2006. 5,11,12 Since that time, new devices have been approved by the FDA including the Salto-Talaris, INBONE, and STAR systems. 12 Although these implants are approved for use with cement fixation, they are almost universally used off-label and feature porous components for fixation by bone ingrowth at the tibial and talar surfaces.…”
Section: Ankle Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2) is the most common device used in the United States and was the first device to receive approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prior to 2006. 5,11,12 Since that time, new devices have been approved by the FDA including the Salto-Talaris, INBONE, and STAR systems. 12 Although these implants are approved for use with cement fixation, they are almost universally used off-label and feature porous components for fixation by bone ingrowth at the tibial and talar surfaces.…”
Section: Ankle Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,11,12 Since that time, new devices have been approved by the FDA including the Salto-Talaris, INBONE, and STAR systems. 12 Although these implants are approved for use with cement fixation, they are almost universally used off-label and feature porous components for fixation by bone ingrowth at the tibial and talar surfaces. [6][7][8] Fig .…”
Section: Ankle Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, newer implants have demonstrated longevity, and there is increasing evidence that total ankle replacement is clinically and functionally superior to ankle fusion 4 . Because the benefits of the surgical alternatives for ankle arthritis are less well understood than those of the surgical options for hip and knee arthritis 5 , patients with ankle arthritis may not receive health-care insurance coverage for surgical intervention or may be required by payers to try prolonged conservative measures prior to undergoing surgical interventions that are costly but more effective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%