2013
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The British List: A Checklist of Birds of Britain (8th edition)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, step 9). Species traits were collated from Carter (), Robinson (), JNCC (), van Emden and Harrington (), Chinery (), Fera (), Harrop et al (), Natural England () and RIS (). Herbivorous species were classified as primary consumers and all other species, including omnivorous species, were classified as secondary consumers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, step 9). Species traits were collated from Carter (), Robinson (), JNCC (), van Emden and Harrington (), Chinery (), Fera (), Harrop et al (), Natural England () and RIS (). Herbivorous species were classified as primary consumers and all other species, including omnivorous species, were classified as secondary consumers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is categorized as LC in the European Red List with the expectation of increasing the size of local populations (European Red List, 2015). Native to mainland Europe and the Mediterranean, it currently occurs in the UK with a resident and most likely introduced population (Harrop et al, 2013). This would explain the limited differences Table 5.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of Bird Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all the atlases, attempts have been made to map the distribution of non‐native species. The British Ornithologists’ Union recognizes nine non‐native species as having self‐sustaining populations (Harrop, Collinson, Dudley, & Kehoe, ). These species are very familiar to bird surveyors, and reporting is thought to be as effective as for native species, with estimates of change being equally robust.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%