The British Object Relations Theorists: Balint, Winnicott, Fairbairn, Guntrip

Abstract

What I believe to be the essential contribution of this group of analysts may be summarized as follows. The role of object relations has always been a prominent theme in analytic thought and has become much more so in recent years. Instead of grafting the implications of relations onto a theory that started from a different standpoint, what the British group has done is to show that the development of the person has to be conceived as the progressive differentiation of a structure from a unitary matrix that itself interacts at a holistic personal level from the start. While Balint noted clinical data that required this step, he did not put forward a theoretical scheme. Winnicott, who suggested more specifically how the infant's relationships at the earliest stages patterned its whole subsequent personal development, also refrained from following through the theoretical logic of his observations. Fairbairn was the first analyst to expose the questionable logic of a developmental scheme based upon the energic concepts that Freud retained as his theoretical base. Fairbairn's scheme, however, did not account adequately for the earliest developmental stages as these were inferred from the study of regressive states. Guntrip, making full use of Winnicott's views, has sought to make good this limitation. The British group does not presume to have made anything like an adequate conceptual map for the development of the psyche. The theoretical problems are far too complex for that. They have, however, shown a fruitful direction and have influenced many areas of contemporary psychoanalytic thought.

Psychoanalysis and critical theory: A new quarrel about revisionism?

“…One could say, to try and synthesize the view brought on by object relations theory, that it imparts a new role to certain basic developmental achievements. If these are “successfully attained, then the individual is established with the capacity to relate effectively to others and himself, whereas failure means restricted or distorted development” (Sutherland, , p. 839). This represents a shift from a framework in which drives are understood as the motor of mental life to one in which the fundamental ingredients are relational configurations.…”

Psychoanalysis and Prevention in Childhood Mental Health

“…Still others have resulted in the revision of psychoanalytic theory. This was true, for example, of the findings of the objectrelations theorists (Sutherland, 1980). Indeed, in all this research on child behavior, psychoanalytic theory was not so much a guide as a stimulus.…”

On Becoming a Psychoanalyst: Education or Experience

“…(Sutherland, 1980) Every analyst has some idiosyncratic attitude towards the theoretical assumptions which guide him in his practice. I was in a special position to notice this while still in training.…”