Subjects judged as "same" or "different" pairs of visual stimuli, each either an X or an 0, whose onsets were separated by intervals of 50, roo, 150 or zoo ms. When the interstimulus interval (ISI) was held constant within a block of 40 trials (Experiment I), decision time was independent of ISI. But when IS1 was varied unpredictably from trial to trial (Experiments I1 and 111), decision times increased the shorter the 1.51. This effect was more marked for "same" than for "different" decisions. These results fail to support a single-channel interpretation, but suggest that variations in decision time depend on the subject's expectancy as to when the second stimulus will follow the first.