In this paper we consider the spatial dispersion of unemployment vis-à-vis that of inflation and the implication of this relative dispersion for fiscal policy. Two empirical tests yield results that are consistent with our a priori expectations that inflation is more evenly distributed throughout the economy (i.e., less dispersed spatially) than is unemployment. Using a simple short-run model, we argue that tax policy should be geared to a price stability objective and expenditure policy to a full employment objective. Consequently, the Phillips curve dilemma could be lessened by the appropriate use of tax and expenditure policy.Despite the persistence of high overall rates of unemploy-ment and inflation, little theoretical or empirical attention has been devoted to the spatial dispersion of unemployment vis-avis that of inflation or to the theoretical implication of this relative dispersion for fiscal policy. Given differences in spatial dispersion, is it possible to lessen, or even to eliminate, a &dquo;simple&dquo; national Phillips curve-type trade off between unemployment and inflation by pairing tax policy with one objective and expenditure policy with the other?1