2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-014-1083-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The buffering capacity of lithospheric mantle: implications for diamond formation

Abstract: 50 ppm or less O 2 is required to shift a depleted mantle peridotite the observed four log units of fO 2 . Coupled with the observed distribution of samples at values of fO 2 intermediate between the most reduced (metal-saturated) and most oxidized (carbonate-saturated) possible values for diamond stability, these results demonstrate that peridotites are very poor sinks or sources of O 2 for possible redox reactions to form diamond. A corollary of the poor redox buffering capacity of cratonic peridotites is th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As these melts migrate and ultimately cool within eclogitic units, crystallization will concentrate the melt in carbonate components, thus reducing the redox stability field of carbonate melt and encouraging diamond/graphite precipitation. Luth and Stachel (2014) propose a slightly different mechanism for diamond formation which would also only produce diamonds on cooling. The more effective scavenging process may explain why a greater proportion of diamonds are found in eclogitic compared to peridotitic rocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As these melts migrate and ultimately cool within eclogitic units, crystallization will concentrate the melt in carbonate components, thus reducing the redox stability field of carbonate melt and encouraging diamond/graphite precipitation. Luth and Stachel (2014) propose a slightly different mechanism for diamond formation which would also only produce diamonds on cooling. The more effective scavenging process may explain why a greater proportion of diamonds are found in eclogitic compared to peridotitic rocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Richardson et al, 1984;Stachel and Harris, 1997;Luth and Stachel, 2014) and high pressure experiments show that diamond precipitation is especially favorable from (alkali)-carbonate bearing systems (e.g. Litvin et al, 1997;Sokol et al, 2000;Pal'yanov et al, 2002).…”
Section: Growth Of Diamonds By Redox Reactions During Carbonatite Metmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was suggested by Luth and Stachel (2014) that diamond formation in the lithosphere is unlikely to be controlled by reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ because there is too little buffering potential in such reactions; diamond precipitation as a result of cooling and depressurising C-H-O fluids was proposed instead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concerns raised by Luth and Stachel (2014) should, however, be taken into consideration when attempting to explain the relationships between δ 13 C and δ…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%