2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The buffering effects of rejection-inhibiting attentional training on social and performance threat among adult students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Attentional bias modification trainings have been developed and successfully applied to anxiety disorders to reduce sensitivity to threat . A series of studies has shown the potential to retrain attention toward compassionate images of others and away from rejecting stimuli in people with low self‐esteem . These paradigms could be used to reduce oversensitivity to power issues within social relationships in EDs and increase attention to compassionate images of others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attentional bias modification trainings have been developed and successfully applied to anxiety disorders to reduce sensitivity to threat . A series of studies has shown the potential to retrain attention toward compassionate images of others and away from rejecting stimuli in people with low self‐esteem . These paradigms could be used to reduce oversensitivity to power issues within social relationships in EDs and increase attention to compassionate images of others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this provides a necessary manipulation check and allows initial tests of mechanisms of action, it does not provide information about changes in cognitive processing beyond the confines of a particular paradigm. Of those studies that did include independent measures, results have been mixed regarding generalization of cognitive change, with some studies finding generalization (CBM-A [44,45,54,60,94]; CBM-I [65,71,77,79]) and others not (CBM-A [95]; CBM-I [74,81,84,96]). The lack of generalization found in some studies could suggest that CBM may not change cognition in real-world situations.…”
Section: Limitations Of Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in the clinical and individual differences literature suggest that persons with high trait anxiety or a clinical anxiety disorder display an attentional bias towards threat stimuli (for reviews see Bar-Haim, Lamy, Pergamin, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van IJzendoorn, 2007;Cisler & Koster, 2010;Mathews & MacLeod, 2002). These findings have critical implications for understanding the cognitive origins of anxiety (e.g., MacLeod, Rutherford, Campbell, Ebsworthy, & Holker, 2002) as well as providing the impetus for new interventions through attentional training (e.g., Dandeneau & Baldwin, 2009;See, MacLeod & Bridle, 2009). The test anxiety literature has somewhat lagged behind these developments and it has yet to be established whether test anxiety, like clinical and high trait anxiety, is also characterised by an attentional bias towards corresponding threat stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%