The build-up and transfer of sensorimotor temporal recalibration measured via a synchronization task

Sugano, Yoshimori; Keetels, Mirjam; Vroomen, Jean

doi:10.1163/187847612x647685

Cited by 2 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The order (the right first, or the left first) was same as the pre-test. After each mouse-press, a tone was delivered at a constant delay at either 50 ms (non-delayed condition) or 150 ms (delayed condition), following earlier studies (e.g., Sugano et al, 2010 , 2012 ). These values were expected to elicit quantifiable adaptive shifts, while they were still perceived as a single event (150 ms), or were expected to be perceived as subjectively simultaneous (50 ms).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Perception of temporal synchrony between one’s own action (e.g., tapping) and a sensory feedback following the action (e.g., a flash or a tone) can be flexibly changed after prolonged exposure of an artificially induced temporal delay of the sensory feedback, which sometimes leads to a reversed sensation of the cause-effect relationship ( Cunningham et al, 2001 ; Stetson et al, 2006 ; Heron et al, 2009 ; Sugano et al, 2010 , 2012 ; Stekelenburg et al, 2011 ; Keetels and Vroomen, 2012 ). This remarkable flexibility of sensorimotor timing is often explained by the concept of temporal recalibration (TR; Fujisaki et al, 2004 ; Vroomen et al, 2004 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The magnitude of audio-motor recalibration has also been found to be greater than visual-motor and tactile-motor recalibration, and there are also costs involved when the modality of the sensory event changes between the adaptation phase and test phase ( Heron et al, 2009 ). Moreover, it has been reported that audio-motor recalibration does not transfer to visuo-motor synchronization tasks ( Sugano et al, 2012 ). Training in a visual temporal order judgment (TOJ) task also does not transfer to an auditory TOJ task and vice versa ( Alais and Cass, 2010 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here, we therefore have sought to verify whether or not concurrent sensorimotor TR occurs for the left and right hand after exposure to different lags. We used motor-auditory pairings rather than motor-visual pairing since the former is expected to evoke greater effects ( Heron et al, 2009 ; Sugano et al, 2012 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We predicted that TR in a tapping task, in which participants try to tap in synchrony with an auditory pacing signal, will manifest itself as a compensatory shift in the natural negative asynchrony between the tap and pacing signal. After exposure to delayed sensory feedback, observers thus were expected to tap earlier to compensate the previously experienced delay ( Sugano et al, 2012 ). The rationale for this is from the Paillard–Fraisse hypothesis and its modified version, the sensory accumulator model (e.g., Aschersleben and Prinz, 1997 ; Aschersleben et al, 2001 ; Aschersleben, 2002 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Concurrent sensorimotor temporal recalibration to different lags for the left and right hand

Sugano¹,

Keetels²,

Vroomen³

2014

Front. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perception of temporal synchrony between one’s own action and the sensory feedback of that action is quite flexible. We examined whether sensorimotor temporal recalibration (TR) involves central or motor-specific components by concurrently exposing the left and right hands to different lags. The experiment was composed of a pre-test, an adaptation phase, and a post-test. During the adaptation phase, participants tapped their left and right index fingers in alternating fashion while each tap induced an auditory feedback signal (a short click sound). One hand was exposed to a long delay between the tap and the sound (~150 ms), while the other hand was exposed to a subjective no-delay (~50 ms). Before and after the adaptation phase (the pre- and post-test), participants tried to tap in synchrony with pacer tones (ISI = 1000 ms). The results showed that the hand that was exposed to the delayed sound corrected for this delay by tapping earlier (a larger anticipation error) than the no-delay hand, indicating TR. Different amounts of TR were found when the left and right hand were concurrently exposed to the same versus different delays. With different exposure- delays for the two hands, there was a TR even for the hand that did not experience any delay in the feedback signal. However, it is not the case with the same exposure delay for the two hands. TR of the hand that experienced delayed feedback also occurred faster and was more complete (~40% greater than that of the hand with no subjective delay) if the two hands were exposed to the same rather than different delays (~20% greater than that of the hand with no subjective delay). These results suggest the existence of cross-talk between the hands, where both central and motor-specific components might be involved.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Concurrent sensorimotor temporal recalibration to different lags for the left and right hand

Sugano¹,

Keetels²,

Vroomen³

2014

Front. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Sensorimotor temporal recalibration: the contribution of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components

Kemenade

Fiehler

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component). Reliability of temporal information might differ across sensory feedback modalities (e.g. auditory or visual), influencing adaptation. Here, we investigated the role of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components on sensorimotor temporal recalibration for motor-auditory events (button press-tone) and motor-visual events (button press-Gabor patch). In the adaptation phase of the experiment, the motor action-feedback event pairs were presented with systematic temporal delays (0ms or 150ms). In the subsequent test phase, sensory feedback of the action were presented with variable delays. The participants were then asked whether this delay could be detected. To disentangle motor-sensory from inter-sensory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptation and test. Our results suggest that motor-auditory recalibration is mainly driven by motor-sensory component, whereas motor-visual recalibration is mainly driven by inter-sensory component. Recalibration transferred from vision to audition, but not from audition to vision. These results indicate that motor-sensory and inter-sensory components of recalibration are weighted in a modality-dependent manner.

show abstract

The build-up and transfer of sensorimotor temporal recalibration measured via a synchronization task

Cited by 2 publications

References 44 publications

Concurrent sensorimotor temporal recalibration to different lags for the left and right hand

Concurrent sensorimotor temporal recalibration to different lags for the left and right hand

Sensorimotor temporal recalibration: the contribution of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About