2017
DOI: 10.1177/0143624417728431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘The building performance gap: Are modellers literate?’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of all these advancements, digital twins (DTs) are particularly notable for their ability to enable the comparison between simulated (and/or predicted) and measured data in buildings, providing insights on the actual performance of physical assets and enabling a continuous monitoring and, at least potentially, improvement process. This ability to learn from "gaps" between predicted and actual performance is particularly interesting with respect to the debated question of "performance gap" in buildings [58][59][60] and can act as a catalyst for innovation within the building research community. However, an effective implementation of the DT concept in buildings is challenging due to the need to incorporate multiple data streams from building information modelling (BIM), building performance simulation, machine learning tools/platforms, etc.…”
Section: Digital Twins In Buildings Mandv and Interpretable Data-driv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all these advancements, digital twins (DTs) are particularly notable for their ability to enable the comparison between simulated (and/or predicted) and measured data in buildings, providing insights on the actual performance of physical assets and enabling a continuous monitoring and, at least potentially, improvement process. This ability to learn from "gaps" between predicted and actual performance is particularly interesting with respect to the debated question of "performance gap" in buildings [58][59][60] and can act as a catalyst for innovation within the building research community. However, an effective implementation of the DT concept in buildings is challenging due to the need to incorporate multiple data streams from building information modelling (BIM), building performance simulation, machine learning tools/platforms, etc.…”
Section: Digital Twins In Buildings Mandv and Interpretable Data-driv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharing knowledge among actors is crucial when addressing building energy performance in a comprehensive way, considering both human and technical factors [31]. In fact, the impact of occupants has to be considered from multiple stand-points [32] and users' behaviour can determine both "re-bound" [33] and "pre-bound" effects [34,35], that can create a substantial difference between expected and measured performance, which can be inscribed in the general category of "performance gaps" [36][37][38]. A "performance gap" can be found in all the stages of building life cycle [39] and the use of standardized assumption in modelling, e.g., to create Energy Performance Certificates, has to be critically questioned when using them to estimate actual energy consumption and potential savings [40].…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore necessary to structure energy performance analysis with respect to both human and technical factors. In turn, this is important, for example, to address properly the gap between design and measured performance, i.e., the performance gap [36][37][38], introduced in Section 2. Further, the concept of statistical "Reference Buildings" [65] (RB) must be introduced to enable building performance benchmarking at multiple scales.…”
Section: Building Energy Performance Analysis At Multiple Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a life cycle perspective, the environmental impact of buildings should account for both embodied (products and construction practices) and operational energy consumptions. Both the measurement of embodied energy and carbon equivalent of buildings (De Wolf et al, 2017) and operational energy consumption (de Wilde, 2017;Imam et al, 2017) represent critical (and debatable) issues that can ultimately determine a relevant "performance gap." Finally, energy transition strategies have to address complementarities (Markard and Hoffmann, 2016) which are crucial for the co-evolution of built environment and energy infrastructures (Junker et al, 2018;Dominković et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%