2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-016-9687-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The built environment determinants of activity participation and walking near the workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the effect of the residential built environment and socioeconomic, mobility, and trip-level factors on mode substitution were assessed for home-based ride-hailing activity. Built environment variables describing the density of residents and employees, diversity of land uses, and design of the street network were tested ( 13 ), along with a zonal binary metric noting the presence of a rapid transit station in this multinomial logistic regression model of mode substitution. For this third model, which applied a specification process similar to the development of the prior two models, the reference case was the substitution of a ride-hailing service for vehicle-based travel compared with the alternatives of replacing public transit use, active travel, or no travel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the effect of the residential built environment and socioeconomic, mobility, and trip-level factors on mode substitution were assessed for home-based ride-hailing activity. Built environment variables describing the density of residents and employees, diversity of land uses, and design of the street network were tested ( 13 ), along with a zonal binary metric noting the presence of a rapid transit station in this multinomial logistic regression model of mode substitution. For this third model, which applied a specification process similar to the development of the prior two models, the reference case was the substitution of a ride-hailing service for vehicle-based travel compared with the alternatives of replacing public transit use, active travel, or no travel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies aimed at increasing PA at the same time need to target multiple levels and settings of the ecologic framework, including the worksite (Hipp et al, 2015). Walkable environments, characterized by density, connectivity, and land use diversity (Forsyth, 2015) can increase the amount of active commuting (Frank, Bradley, Kavage, Chapman, & Lawton, 2008), as well as short active trips taken throughout the working day (Forsyth & Oakes, 2014; Gehrke & Welch, 2017). At the same time, working in a natural and aesthetically pleasing environment can foster going out for a walk in the middle of the day, or encourage walking meetings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context, the transport dynamics refers to traffic flow, and the built environment is the typical part of the road network structure. Some studies have analyzed the relationship between the built environment and traffic systems, such as traffic behaviors [16][17][18][19][20], the association between network structure and road safety [13,21,22], and the correlation between traffic congestion and different attributes of urban land use [23][24][25]. Though they found strong empirical evidence to show the correlation, limited research has investigated the impact of the built environment on traffic flow or complicated relationships between them at the level of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%