2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Burden of Oral Disease among Perinatally HIV-Infected and HIV-Exposed Uninfected Youth

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare oral health parameters in perinatally HIV-infected (PHIV) and perinatally HIV-exposed but uninfected youth (PHEU).MethodsIn a cross-sectional substudy within the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study, participants were examined for number of decayed teeth (DT), Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT), oral mucosal disease, and periodontal disease (PD). Covariates for oral health parameters were examined using zero-inflated negative binomial regression and ordinal logistic regression models.Resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
52
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
52
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were recruited from the Adolescent Master Protocol (AMP) of PHACS, which is a prospective cohort study designed to determine the impact of HIV infection and ART on PHIV youth and includes a comparison group of PHEU youth. The design of the study and eligibility criteria have been defined in several publications (Alperen et al, ; Moscicki et al, ; Van Dyke et al, ). The OHS protocol (Moscicki et al, ; Ryder, Yao, Russell, Moscicki, & Shiboski, ) was a cross‐sectional substudy within AMP with a single visit per subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients were recruited from the Adolescent Master Protocol (AMP) of PHACS, which is a prospective cohort study designed to determine the impact of HIV infection and ART on PHIV youth and includes a comparison group of PHEU youth. The design of the study and eligibility criteria have been defined in several publications (Alperen et al, ; Moscicki et al, ; Van Dyke et al, ). The OHS protocol (Moscicki et al, ; Ryder, Yao, Russell, Moscicki, & Shiboski, ) was a cross‐sectional substudy within AMP with a single visit per subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection in the PHACS OHS, including a full‐mouth examination and assessment of clinical gingival inflammation, probing depths and clinical attachment loss is detailed elsewhere (Moscicki et al, ). Briefly, sites scheduled a comprehensive OHS visit within 3 months of a regularly scheduled AMP annual visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the prevalence of periodontal disease did not differ between perinatally HIV‐infected children and adolescents and perinatally HIV‐exposed uninfected children and adolescents, with 32% of this population having mild or moderate periodontitis, as defined by the modified United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification system. However, using the same classification system, lower prevalence (22%) was reported in the Nutrition Examination Survey of an older general population aged 30‐34 years . Among children living with HIV, a younger age of first exposure to combined antiretroviral therapies was associated with fewer teeth with bleeding on probing at multiple sites .…”
Section: Recent Trends In the Epidemiology Of Periodontal Disease In mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In addition, there is an opportunity to compare the development of this oral microbiome with children and youth under similar beneficial or detrimental environmental conditions . For example, in the recent cross‐sectional multicenter study on HIV and oral health in both perinatally HIV‐infected and perinatally HIV‐exposed uninfected youth, no significant differences in the oral microbiome were noted, with some exceptions, for instance, lower levels of Corynebacterium and Streptococcus mutans among perinatally HIV‐infected youth. As Corynebacterium is considered one of the health‐associated taxa in plaque, this may be one possible contributing factor in the higher caries prevalence in perinatally HIV‐infected youth, as was observed in one study .…”
Section: Current Investigations Into the Microbiology And The Host Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum concurrence of 90% for surfaces with or without caries, PD, and GM position was required. If this level of concurrence was not achieved, the calibrator would review these techniques and conduct a second calibration on another patient until this minimal concurrence was met [20]. There was 97.6–100% concurrence of probing depth assessments within ±1 mm and 96.4–100% concurrence of gingival margins within ±1 mm between calibrator and examiners.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%