The modern epidemic of obesity and insulin resistance with cardiovascular risk factor clustering is related to the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Over 40 years ago, Neel postulated that insulin resistance should confer survival benefit. Extrapolating Neel's hypothesis, we propose that the cluster of associated abnormalities also confers survival benefit and is related to metabolic responses seen in seasonally responsive animals. Weight gain in preparation for winter is accompanied by a range of acute metabolic changes virtually identical to the long-term changes seen in type 2 diabetes. In seasonal animals the responses are acute, physiological and protective. In man, similar responses that would once have conferred survival benefit have become chronic, pathological and harmful in modern life. We hypothesise that type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in man are the result of chronic and inappropriate pinealhypothalamic-adipocyte interactions biologically related to seasonal change.Keywords Adipocyte . Cardiovascular disease . Circadian and circannual rhythm . Clock genes . Hypothalamus . Inflammation . Insulin resistance . Melatonin . Metabolic syndrome . Seasonality . Type 2 diabetes
Neel revisitedThe world is currently in the midst of an epidemic of type 2 diabetes, and around 300 million individuals are predicted to develop this disorder by the year 2025 [1]. The close biological relationship between diabetes and cardiovascular disease has focused attention on the common genetic and environmental antecedents of these conditions-the common soil hypothesis [2]-but the pathophysiological basis of these associations remains obscure. In 1962, Neel proposed the thrifty genotype hypothesis, which postulated that insulin overproduction must at one time have had a beneficial effect, in that it would provide 'an important energy conserving mechanism when food intake was irregular and obesity rare' [3]. Although Neel recognised insulin antagonism rather than insulin resistance, he hypothesised that the combination of obesity with increased insulin (or the presence of insulin antagonists) would lead to the development of diabetes. With hindsight, Neel was essentially speculating on the potential metabolic benefits of insulin resistance. The recognition in the last 20 years of an insulin resistance risk cluster [4] indicates that, under certain circumstances, elements of the risk cluster should also be beneficial to the survival of the organism, a response that, by analogy with Neel's original hypothesis, may coincidentally lead to the development of cardiovascular disease in times of plenty. The development of both insulin resistance and inflammation are physiological responses to increasing adiposity that, by definition, should be beneficial to the survival of the organism. The observation that the chronic metabolic milieu associated with type 2 diabetes is harmful raises the possibility that the adipocyte response to fat loading is beneficial when acute and short-lived, as is o...