For many years the NHS has had the benefit of research ethics committees (RECs) which play an important role in governing research. The decision that a research project may proceed is an important management responsibility of an REC not only because of the importance of making sure that all research is ethical, but because research itself involves the take up of valuable and often scarce NHS resources. Given RECs’ duty, it is surprising that there are no standards for RECs to judge their ethical reasoning by nor guidelines on how to make their final decisions. Inevitably RECs face constant criticism about their opinions and many researchers field their questions with little knowledge about RECs and the way they work. The aim of this article is to demystify RECs, and outline what applicants can expect when submitting their proposals to them. Having a better understanding of RECs, should help prepare practitioners and provide them with the information they need to work their way through the ethical approval process.